Teasley v. State
| Decision Date | 02 September 1983 |
| Docket Number | Docket No. 198 |
| Citation | 466 A.2d 37,296 Md. 655 |
| Parties | Tyrone TEASLEY v. STATE of Maryland. Petition |
| Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari filed in the above entitled case and the answer filed thereto, it is this 2nd day of September, 1983
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition be, and it is hereby, granted and the writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals, 54 Md.App. 454, 458 A.2d 93, shall issue and said case shall be transferred to the regular docket as No. 73, September Term, 1983; and it is further
ORDERED that counsel shall file briefs and printed record extract in accordance with Rule 830, appellant's brief and record...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
15 cases
-
Jones v. State
...Appeals in an unreported opinion, relying upon its earlier decision in Whitehead v. State, 54 Md.App. 428, 458 A.2d 905, cert. denied, 296 Md. 655 (1983), affirmed the judgment. It reasoned that § 342 specified five different acts through which the crime of theft could be committed; that th......
-
Jones v. State
...own. Jacocks v. Montgomery County, 58 Md.App. 95, 472 A.2d 485 (1984); Whitehead v. State, 54 Md.App. 428, 458 A.2d 905, cert. denied, 296 Md. 655 (1983). The statements taken by Officer Doyle and Agent Waters were summaries of information given to them by Mrs. Jordan during interviews. The......
-
Wagner v. Wagner
...interviews with children is well-settled in Maryland. See Shapiro v. Shapiro, 54 Md.App. 477, 480, 458 A.2d 1257, cert. denied, 296 Md. 655 (1983); Nutwell v. Prince George's County Dep't of Social Servs., 21 Md.App. 100, 109, 318 A.2d 563 (1974); Marshall v. Stefanides, 17 Md.App. 364, 369......
-
Collins v. State
...also Jacocks v. Montgomery County, 58 Md.App. 95, 472 A.2d 485 (1984); Whitehead v. State, 54 Md.App. 428, 458 A.2d 905, cert. denied, 296 Md. 655 (1983). In the present case, we conclude Thorpe's statement paraphrased in the police report was similar to the statements found non-discoverabl......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Joinder of Offenses
...was not duplicative), cert. denied, 452 Md. 545, 157 A.3d 820 (2017); Whitehead v. State, 54 Md. App. 428, 458 A.2d 905, cert. denied, 296 Md. 655 (1983); State v. Hunt, 49 Md. App. 355, 432 A.2d 479(1981); Cooper v. State, 44 Md. App. 59, 407 A.2d 756 (1979); Ayre v. State, 21 Md. App. 61,......