Techvend, Inc. v. Phoenix Network, Inc.
Citation | 564 So.2d 1145 |
Decision Date | 03 July 1990 |
Docket Number | No. 89-2299,89-2299 |
Parties | 15 Fla. L. Weekly D1760 TECHVEND, INC., Appellant, v. The PHOENIX NETWORK, INC. a Florida corporation and Madlee Enterprises, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Michael D. Gelety, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Mishan, Sloto, Hoffman & Greenberg and Julie Feigeles, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and LEVY, JJ.
This appeal is from a judgment entered on a default. While there is an indication that the default was initially erroneously entered, it is uncontradicted that the defendant-appellant did not move to set aside the judgment until more than three months after it became aware of its existence and did not file supporting affidavits until two months after that. It is entirely clear that such a delay constituted a lack of the due diligence which is required to justify setting aside a default. Fischer v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A., 511 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (five weeks); Bayview Tower Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Schweizer, 475 So.2d 982, 983 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (one month); see also Garvin v. South Carolina Ins. Co., 528 So.2d 929 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (six months).
While the theoretical underpinning of the due diligence requirement has perhaps not so far been fully explicated, it would appear that the requirement that one move expeditiously to nullify a default is directly related to the reasons for the entry of the default in the first place--to provide for the prompt disposition of legal proceedings. See B.C. Builders Supply Co. v. Maldonado, 405 So.2d 1345, 1348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). In essence, one might say, then, that timely action is required to avoid "defaulting" upon the opportunity to set aside a previously entered default. On this basis, the time provided initially to answer the complaint, twenty days, might well serve as a rule of thumb for the period in which a defendant must act to vacate a default after learning of its entry. See Fischer, 511 So.2d at 1087; Bayview, 475 So.2d at 982. In any case, the time involved in this case is far longer than either the standard we have tentatively advanced here, or the periods actually deemed excessive in the decided cases.
Affirmed.
While I concur in the first paragraph of the opinion, I am unable to subscribe to the twenty-day rule of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ginsberg v. Lennar Florida Holdings, Inc.
...denied, 614 So.2d 502 (Fla.1993); World's Finest Inc. v. Carpenter, 564 So.2d 626 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Techvend Inc. v. Phoenix Network Inc., 564 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Fischer v. Barnett Banks, 511 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Bayview Tower Condominium v. Schweizer, 475 So.2d 982......
-
ALLSTATE FLORIDIAN INS. v. RONCO INVENT.
...We conclude that it was. At the hearing on the motion, trial counsel for Ronco and Popeil argued that Techvend, Inc. v. Phoenix Network, Inc., 564 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), supported their claim that they had demonstrated due diligence. However, Appellees completely misconstrued Techve......
-
Paleias v. Wang
...offered for the delay. 5 World's Finest Products, Inc. v. Carpenter, 564 So.2d 626 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Techvend, Inc. v. Phoenix Network, Inc., 564 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Fischer v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A., 511 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Bayview Tower Condominium As......
-
Electric Engineering Co., Inc. v. General Elec. Canada, Inc., 91-2896
...clerk's default upon learning of the entry of same, see Apolaro v. Falcon, 566 So.2d 815 (Fla. 3d DCA1990); Techvend, Inc. v. Phoenix Network, Inc., 564 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA1990), and (3) the defendant made a sufficient showing of a meritorious defense. As to the latter, although it is t......
-
Chapter 1-4 Defaults
...D 2689 (Fla. 3d DCA Dec. 20, 2020) (a ten-week delay is not an exercise of due diligence).[48] Techvend, Inc. v. Phoenix Network, Inc., 564 So. 2d 1145, 1146 (Fla. 3d DCA...
-
Chapter 1-4 Defaults
...2d 1250, 1252 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (four month delay was not an exercise of due diligence).[47] Techvend, Inc. v. Phoenix Network, Inc., 564 So. 2d 1145, 1146 (Fla. 3d DCA...