Teixeira v. Alameda Cnty., 17–982.
Decision Date | 14 May 2018 |
Docket Number | No. 17–982.,17–982. |
Citation | 138 S.Ct. 1988 (Mem),201 L.Ed.2d 249 |
Parties | John TEIXEIRA, et al., petitioners, v. ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, et al. |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial5 cases
-
Duncan v. Becerra
...and home.’ " Teixeira v. Cty. of Alameda , 873 F.3d 670, 676– 77 (9th Cir. 2017), cert. denied sub nom. Teixeira v. Alameda Cty. , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 1988, 201 L.Ed.2d 249 (2018) (quoting District of Columbia v. Heller , 554 U.S. 570, 635, 128 S.Ct. 2783, 171 L.Ed.2d 637 (2008) ). At ......
-
Pena v. Lindley
... ... Teixeira v. Cty. of Alameda , 873 F.3d 670, 683 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). The ... ...
-
Rhode v. Becerra
...Teixeira v. Cty. of Alameda , 873 F.3d 670, 687 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc ), cert. denied sub nom., Teixeira v. Alameda Cty., Cal. , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S. Ct. 1988, 201 L.Ed.2d 249 (2018) ("We emphasize that in many circumstances, there will be no need to disentangle an asserted right of ret......
-
Drummond v. Township
...Craig v. Boren , 429 U.S. 190, 195, 97 S.Ct. 451, 50 L.Ed.2d 397, (1976) ), cert. denied sub nom. Teixeira v. Alameda County , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 1988, 201 L.Ed.2d 249 (2018). Defendants argue that in order to claim third-party standing on behalf of potential customers, "the would-be ......
Request a trial to view additional results