Teixeira v. County of Alameda

Docket Number13-17132
Decision Date10 October 2017

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
156 cases
  • Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc. v. Reynolds
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • June 30, 2021
    ...the plaintiffs have no basis to bring an unconstitutional-conditions claim." Hodges , 917 F.3d at 912 ; see also Teixeira v. Cnty. of Alameda , 873 F.3d 670, 690 (9th Cir. 2017) ("Never has it been suggested, for example, that if there were no burden on a woman's right to obtain an abortion......
  • Travieso v. Glock Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Arizona
    • March 10, 2021
    ...The Second Amendment also protects "ancillary rights" necessary to realize the core right to possess a firearm. Teixeira v. Cty. of Alameda , 873 F.3d 670, 677 (9th Cir. 2017) (citing Jackson v. City and County of San Francisco , 746 F.3d 953, 968 (9th Cir. 2014), cert. denied , 576 U.S. 10......
  • Fouts v. Bonta
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • September 22, 2021
    ...while bypassing the question of a 1923 statute in Silvester . At the long end of the historical spectrum, in Teixeira v. County of Alameda , 873 F.3d 670, 684 (9th Cir. 2017), the Ninth Circuit began its historical survey with the 1689 English Bill of Rights for its review of a zoning restr......
  • Duncan v. Becerra
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • March 29, 2019
    ...protects ‘the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home.’ " Teixeira v. Cty. of Alameda , 873 F.3d 670, 676– 77 (9th Cir. 2017), cert. denied sub nom. Teixeira v. Alameda Cty. , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 1988, 201 L.Ed.2d 249 (2018) (quoting Distric......
  • Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
  • Second-Class' Rhetoric, Ideology, and Doctrinal Change
    • United States
    • Georgetown Law Journal No. 110-3, March 2022
    • March 1, 2022
    ...en banc , 992 F.3d 765 (9th Cir. 2021); Teixeira v. Cnty. of Alameda, 822 F.3d 1047, 1049, 1063 (9th Cir. 2016), rev’d on reh’g en banc , 873 F.3d 670 (9th Cir. 2017); Peruta v. Cnty. of San Diego, 742 F.3d 1144, 1147, 1179 (9th Cir. 2014), rev’d on reh’g en banc , 824 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 20......
  • 10.1. VALIDITY OF ZONING REGULATIONS.
    • United States
    • State Bar of Arizona Land Use Law (2021 Ed.) 10 Judicial Review of Zoning Ordinances and Decisions
    • Invalid date
    ...right to have a gun store in a particular location as long as their access is not meaningfully constrained. Teixeira v. County of Alameda, 873 F.3d 670 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc) 10.1.8. Delegation of legislative power without standards. When a zoning action is taken by the legislative body,......
  • Appendix A Table of Authorities
    • United States
    • State Bar of Arizona Land Use Law Appendix A Table of Authorities
    • Invalid date
    ...206 F.3d 932 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 874 (2000)...................................... 6-12Teixeira v. County of Alameda, 873 F.3d 670 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc)...................................................... 6-15, 10-31Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusi......
  • APPENDIX A: TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
    • United States
    • State Bar of Arizona Land Use Law (2021 Ed.) Appendix A Table of Authorities
    • Invalid date
    ...F.3d 932 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 874 (2000) ................................................6-15 Teixeira v. County of Alameda, 873 F.3d 670 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc)...................................................................6-19, 10-37 Texas Dept. of Housing and Communit......
  • Get Started for Free