Tennessee v. Turner

Decision Date26 June 1989
Docket Number88-1063.
CitationTennessee v. Turner, 492 U.S. 902 (1989)
PartiesTENNESSEE v. TURNER.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted.Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Alabama v. Smith, 490 U. S. 794(1989).

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
164 cases
  • KP v. Juzwic
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Connecticut
    • June 19, 1995
  • People v. Pollard
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • June 25, 1991
    ...then recent opinion in Alabama v. Smith (1989) 490 U.S. 794, 109 S.Ct. 2201, 104 L.Ed.2d 865 (Smith ). (Tennessee v. Turner (1989) 492 U.S. 902, 109 S.Ct. 3208, 106 L.Ed.2d 559.) The circuit court in turn remanded the matter to the district court. (Turner v. State of Tenn., supra, 726 F.Sup......
  • Satterlee v. Wolfenbarger
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • June 30, 2006
    ...to consider the State's two-year plea offer with the effective assistance of counsel."), vacated on other grounds, 492 U.S. 902, 109 S.Ct. 3208, 106 L.Ed.2d 559 (1989); Nunes v. Mueller, 350 F.3d 1045, 1057-58 (9th Cir. 2003), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1038, 125 S.Ct. 808, 160 L.Ed.2d 605 (200......
  • Bolden v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp. Authority
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • December 31, 1991
    ...We affirmed both of these holdings. Transport Workers' Local 234 v. SEPTA, 863 F.2d 1110 (3d Cir.1988), vacated, 492 U.S. 902, 109 S.Ct. 3208, 3209, 106 L.Ed.2d 560 (1989), reaffirmed, 884 F.2d 709 (3d Cir.1989). 4 With respect to return-to-work testing, we wrote (id. at SEPTA must justify ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Deal or no deal? Remedying ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargaining.
    • United States
    • Yale Law Journal Vol. 120 No. 6, April 2011
    • April 1, 2011
    ...v. Tennessee, 858 F.2d 1201 (6th Cir. 1988) (vacating the conviction and remanding back to plea negotiations), vacated on other grounds, 492 U.S. 902 (17.) United States v. Blaylock, 20 F.3d 1458, 1468 (9th Cir. 1994). (18.) State v. Taccetta, 975 A.2d 928 (N.J. 2009); State v. Greuber, 165......