Terlecki v. Straus
| Decision Date | 16 October 1914 |
| Docket Number | No. 90.,90. |
| Citation | Terlecki v. Straus, 86 N.J.L. 708, 92 A. 1087 (N.J. 1914) |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
| Parties | MARY TERLECKI, RESPONDENT, v. FERDINAND A. STRAUS, APPELLANT |
Appeal from Supreme Court. Proceeding under the Workmen's Compensation Act (P. L. 1911, p. 134) by Mary Terlecki against Ferdinand A. Straus. From a judgment of the Supreme Court (89 Atl. 1023), affirming a judgment for the petitioner, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Vredenburgh, Wall & Carey, of Jersey City, for appellant .
John H. Kafes, of Trenton, for respondent.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
28 cases
-
Giles v. W.E. Beverage Corp.
... ... statutory phrase of an accident arising "out of" ... the employment. See Bryant v. Fissell, 84 ... N.J.L. 72, 78, 79; 86 Atl. Rep. 458; Terlecki v ... Strauss, 85 N.J.L. 454; 89 Atl. Rep. 1023; ... affirmed, 86 N.J.L. 708; 92 Atl. Rep. 1087; ... Nardone v. Public Service, &c., Co., supra ... ...
-
Moosebrugger v. Prospect Presbyterian Church of Maplewood
... ... See Terlecki v. Strauss, 85 N.J.L. 454, 89 A. 1023 (Sup.Ct.1914) affirmed 86 N.J.L. 708, 92 A. 1087 (E. & A. 1914); 1 Larson, Workmen's Compensation Law (1952), ... ...
-
Macko v. Herbert Hinchman & Son
... ... See also Terlecki v. Strauss, 85 N.J.L. 454, 89 A. 1023 (Sup.Ct.1914); Kelly v. Hackensack Water Co., 10 N.J.Super. 528, 77 A.2d 467 (App.Div.1950), and 71 C.J. 680 ... ...
-
Geltman v. Reliable Linen & Supply Company
... ... have happened," the statutory requirement in this behalf ... is met. Newcomb v. Albertson, 85 N.J.L ... 435; Terlecki v. Strauss, 85 N.J.L. 454; ... affirmed, 86 N.J.L. 708; Furferi v ... Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 117 N.J.L. 508 ... What ... ...
Get Started for Free