Terre Haute Gas Corp. v. Johnson

Decision Date11 May 1943
Docket NumberNo. 27736.,27736.
Citation48 N.E.2d 455,221 Ind. 499
PartiesTERRE HAUTE GAS CORPORATION et al. v. JOHNSON et al.
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

On petition for rehearing and for modification of mandate.

Petition denied, and modification of mandate granted in accordance with opinion.

For former opinion, see 45 N.E.2d 484.Appeal from Clay Circuit Court; John W. Baumunk, Judge.

Davis, Baltzell & Sparks and Baker, Daniels, Wallace & Seagle, all of Indianapolis, Urban C. Stover, Deputy Atty. Gen., George N. Beamer, Atty. Gen., Cooper, Royse, Gambill & Crawford, of Terre Haute, and Rawley & Stewart, of Brazil, for appellants.

Beasley, O'Brien, Lewis & Beasley and Frank Hamilton, all of Terre Haute, for appellees.

SHAKE, Judge.

The Terre Haute Gas Corporation has petitioned for a rehearing and the Indiana Gas Utilities Company for modification of the mandate.

The case of Sunshine Bus Lines v. Railroad Commission, Tex.Civ.App. 1941, 149 S.W.2d 228, heretofore relied upon by the appellants has been overruled. Webster v. Texas & Pacific Motor Transport Co., Tex.Sup. 1942, 166 S.W.2d 75. With this observation we are content to stand on the original opinion. The petition for a rehearing is denied.

It has been called to our attention that since the principal opinion was filed, the Public Service Commission of Indiana has held a hearing and entered an order or orders approving the sale of the physical assets, franchises and permits of Indiana Gas Utilities Company to the Terre Haute Gas Corporation. Under these circumstances no good purpose would be served by requiring said parties to restore the status quo ante as ordered by the judgment of the Clay Circuit Court. The petition of Indiana Gas Utilities Company is sustained and the mandate of this court is hereby modified to read as follows: The Clay Circuit Court is directed to strike from its final judgment in this cause the part thereof by which the Terre Haute Gas Corporation was ordered and directed to reconvey to the Indiana Gas Utilities Company all the property attempted to be sold and conveyed to said Terre Haute Gas Corporation; also, to strike from said judgment the part thereof requiring said parties to restore the ownership, management and control of said property to the status which existed on the date of the filing of the original complaint. Subject only to the aforesaid modifications, the judgment of the Clay Circuit Court is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • State ex rel. Evansville City Coach Lines v. Rawlings
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • June 25, 1951
    ... ... may have believed that the reduced rates were exorbitant.' Terre Haute Gas Corporation v. Johnson, 1942, 221 Ind. 499, 506, 45 N.E.2d 484, ... Membership Corp. v. Public Service Comm., 1948, 225 Ind. 666, 674, 77 N.E.2d 572, 575 ... ...
  • Greyhound Corp., Southeastern Greyhound Lines Division v. Carter
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • October 21, 1960
    ... ... the agency ruling invalid if there is substantial competent evidence to sustain the ruling, (Terre Haute Gas Corp. v. Johnson, 221 Ind. 499, 45 N.E.2d 484, 48 N.E.2d 455 under an Indiana statute ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT