Terre Haute Trust Company v. Scott
Decision Date | 03 June 1932 |
Docket Number | 14,145 |
Citation | 181 N.E. 369,94 Ind.App. 461 |
Parties | TERRE HAUTE TRUST COMPANY ET AL. v. SCOTT, RECEIVER |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
From Vermillion Circuit Court; William C. Wait, Judge.
Intervening petition by the Terre Haute Trust Company and another in the receivership of the Clinton Trust Company, Matthew M. Scott receiver, seeking the allowance of a preferred claim against the receiver. From an allowance of the claim as a general claim, without preference, the interveners appealed.
Reversed.
C. A Royse, for appellants.
James Douglas, for appellee.
Appellants filed an intervening petition against appellee in the receivership proceedings of the Clinton Trust Company seeking the allowance of a claim asserted by them against the trust company as a preferred claim, also seeking to have certain assets of said trust company which passed into the hands of the appellee as such receiver impressed with such preference. Appellee filed objections to the allowance of appellant's claim as a preferred claim. Trial was had upon the issues thus tendered, resulting in a judgment allowing the claim as a general claim and denying it preference. Motion for a new trial was overruled and this appeal followed. Appellants assign as errors for reversal the overruling of their motion for a new trial, and in various methods the refusal of the court to allow their claim as a preferred claim.
The facts are undisputed; they were stipulated between the parties in the following language:
The sole question in this case, submitted for consideration, is whether or not under the facts (all of which were stipulated, as above set out), the appellants are entitled to have their claim against the Clinton Trust Company allowed as a preferred claim.
No relation, guarded with more care and circumspection, is recognized by the law than that of trustee and cestui que trust. As the words themselves imply, it involves the exercise of trust, confidence and utmost good faith upon the part of the trustee for the benefit and furtherance of the interest of the beneficiary under the trust. Whether the trustee be a corporation or an individual, the same rules must of necessity apply. The abuse of the trust can confer no rights on the trustee abusing it or on those claiming privity with him. Neither can he voluntarily or at his option without the consent of the beneficiary repudiate the trust, to the disadvantage or injury of such beneficiary. Kimmel v. Dickson (1894), 5 S.D. 221, 58 N.W. 561, 25 L. R. A. 309, 49 Am. St. 869.
The receiver took the assets of the trust company subject to all legal and equitable claims of others. Lamb, Rec., v. Morris (1888), 118 Ind. 179, 20 N.E. 746, 4 L. R. A. 111; Shopert v. Indiana Nat. Bank (1907), 41 Ind. App. 474, 83 N.E. 515; Crowder v. Story (1929), 90 Ind.App. 598, 169 N.E. 470.
While the first impression created by a reading and investigation of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Terre Haute Trust Co. v. Scott
... 94 Ind.App. 461 181 N.E. 369 TERRE HAUTE TRUST CO. et al. v. SCOTT. No. 14145. Appellate Court of Indiana, in Banc. June 3, 1932 ... Appeal from Vermillion Circuit Court; Wm. Wait, Judge. Intervening petition by the Terre Haute Trust Company, as trustee, etc., against Matthew M. Scott, as receiver of Clinton Trust Company, in the receivership proceedings of the Clinton Trust Company. From the judgment, plaintiffs appeal. Reversed, with directions. C. A. Royse, of Terre Haute, for appellants. James Douglas, of Clinton, for appellee ... ...