Terrell Wells Swimming Pool v. Rodriguez
Decision Date | 02 February 1944 |
Docket Number | No. 11368.,11368. |
Citation | 182 S.W.2d 824 |
Parties | TERRELL WELLS SWIMMING POOL et al. v. RODRIGUEZ. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from 57th District Court, Bexar County; Robt. W. B. Terrell, Judge.
Suit in equity by Jacob I. Rodriguez against the Terrell Wells Swimming Pool, Inc., and another for a mandatory injunction requiring defendants to offer and extend equal accommodations, facilities and privileges at corporate defendant's swimming pool to plaintiff and all other persons of Hispanic or Mexican descent. From a judgment granting the injunction, defendants appeal.
Reversed, and judgment denying injunction entered.
Geo. G. Clifton, of San Antonio, for appellants.
M. C. Gonzales, of San Antonio, and H. S. Lattimore, of Fort Worth, for appellee.
This suit was instituted by Jacob I. Rodriguez on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly circumstanced, seeking a mandatory injunction requiring defendants, Terrell Wells Swimming Pool, Inc., and H. E. Stumberg, its president and general manager in the operation of the swimming pool, to offer and extend equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, and privileges to plaintiff and all other persons of Hispanic or Mexican descent.
Upon a trial before the court without the intervention of a jury judgment was rendered granting the injunction as prayed for.
From this judgment Terrell Wells Swimming Pool, Inc., a private corporation, and H. E. Stumberg, its president and manager, have presented this appeal.
The law in this State is well settled that in the absence of Civil Rights Legislation to the contrary the proprietor of a place of amusement which is privately operated can refuse to sell a ticket to and may thereby exclude any person he desires from the use of his facilities for any reason sufficient to him, or for no reason whatever. If a ticket has been purchased by a person whom the proprietor desires to eject from the premises, this may be done by refunding the price of the ticket and not using unnecessary force to make the ejectment. A ticket to a swimming pool is merely a revocable license. Jordon v. Concho Theatres, Tex.Civ.App., 160 S. W.2d 275; Kelly v. Dent Theaters, Tex. Civ.App., 21 S.W.2d 592; Boswell v. Barnum & Bailey, 135 Tenn. 35, 185 S.W. 692, L.R.A.1916E, 912; 26 R.C.L. 704; Bowlin v. Lyon, 67 Iowa 536, 25 N.W. 766, 56 Am.Rep. 355; Woollcott v. Shubert, 217 N.Y. 212, 111 N.E. 829, L.R.A.1916E, 248, Ann.Cas.1916B, 726; Cecil v. Green, 161 Ill. 265, 43 N.E. 1105, 32 L.R.A. 566; United States v. Washington, C.C., 20 F. 630; 14 C.J.S., Civil Rights, § 3, p. 1161.
The rule, as it exists in Texas, is well stated in 26 R.C.L. 704, as follows:
Appellee contends, however, that this rule has been changed by H. C. R. No. 105, passed by the regular session of the 48th Legislature, Acts 1943, p. 1119, and the Governor's proclamation issued June 25, 1943.
On May 6, 1943, the Honorable Coke Stevenson, Governor of the State of Texas, approved House Concurrent Resolution 105, adopted by the 48th Legislature of the State of Texas, wherein it was resolved as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Avent, 654
...courts of this nation. Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, 296 N. Y. 249, 72 N.E.2d 697, 1 A.L.R.2d 1160; Terrell Wells Swimming Pool v. Rodriguez, Tex.Civ.App., 182 S.W.2d 824; Booker v. Grand Rapids Medical College, 156 Mich. 95, 120 N.W. 589, 24 L.R.A., N.S., 447; Younger v. Judah, 111 ......
-
Ibe v. Nat'l Football League
...Co., Inc. v. Forum Bank, 613 S.W.2d 68, 70 (Tex. Civ. App.—Fort Worth 1981, no writ)). 64. See Terrell Wells Swimming Pool v. Rodriguez, 182 S.W.2d 824, 825-26 (Tex. Civ. App.—San Antonio 1944, no writ) (explaining that a ticket to a swimming pool is merely a revocable license, subjecting t......
-
Loeb v. Turner
...and broadcasting from a point located on his property. Persons doing so against his wishes are trespassers. Terrell Wells Swimming Pool v. Rodriguez, Tex.Civ.App., 182 S.W.2d 824; Southwestern Broadcasting Co. v. Oil Center Broadcasting Co., Tex.Civ.App., 210 S.W.2d 230. We think the contra......
-
State v Phenix & Assoc.
...become the general law of the state. See Caples v. Cole, 102 S.W.2d 173, 176 (Tex. 1937); Terrell Wells Swimming Pool v. Rodriguez, 182 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Civ. App.-San Antonio 1944, writ ref'd). We hold the trial court lacked jurisdiction to decide the case because Phenix failed to file......