Terry v. State
| Decision Date | 10 April 1947 |
| Docket Number | 2 Div. 237. |
| Citation | Terry v. State, 249 Ala. 96, 29 So.2d 886 (Ala. 1947) |
| Parties | TERRY v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Judson C. Locke, of Marion, for petitioner.
A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for respondent.
From the opinion of the Court of Appeals here under review the following appears: 'When the State had concluded the introduction of its evidence and rested, defendant's counsel moved to exclude all the testimony offered by the State, 'on the grounds the warrant was signed by the prosecuting witness, Mr. Crews. There is a variance in the testimony and the warrant.''
This cause was tried in the circuit court on a complaint filed in that court by the circuit solicitor. It was therefore immaterial who made the original affidavit or at whose instance the warrant of arrest was issued. The trial court correctly refused to exclude the evidence on motion of appellant. Section 346, Title 13, Code; Clark v. City of Uniontown, 4 Ala.App. 264, 58 So. 725; see, also, Gandy v. State, 81 Ala. 68, 1 So. 35, 36.
Writ denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Moreland v. State
...Wood v. State, 28 Ala.App. 464, 187 So. 250, 251 (1939); Terry v. State, 33 Ala.App. 21, 29 So.2d 884, cert. denied, 249 Ala. 96, 29 So.2d 886 (1947); Nesbitt v. State, 343 So.2d 1240 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 343 So.2d 1243 (Ala.1977); Wright v. State, 423 So.2d 345 (Ala.Crim.App.1982......
-
Beverly v. State, 8 Div. 146
...these statutes. Wood v. State, 28 Ala.App. 464, 187 So. 250 (1939); Terry v. State, 33 Ala.App. 21, 29 So.2d 884, cert. denied, 249 Ala. 96, 29 So.2d 886 (1947); Nesbitt v. State, 343 So.2d 1240 Appellant contends that he should only be punished for the offense of murder because it was the ......
-
Riley v. State
...Wood v. State, 28 Ala.App. 464, 187 So. 250, 251 (1939); Terry v. State, 33 Ala.App. 21, 29 So.2d 884, cert. denied, 249 Ala. 96, 29 So.2d 886 (1947); Nesbitt v. State, 343 So.2d 1240 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 343 So.2d 1243 (Ala.1977); Wright v. State, 423 So.2d 345 (Ala.Cr.App.1982). T......
- Brasher v. State