Terry v. State

CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtQUILLIAN
CitationTerry v. State, 305 S.E.2d 170, 166 Ga.App. 632 (Ga. App. 1983)
Decision Date13 May 1983
Docket NumberNo. 66205,66205
PartiesTERRY v. The STATE.

David E. Perry, Tifton, for appellant.

Thomas H. Pittman, Dist. Atty., Robert C. Wilmot, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

QUILLIAN, Presiding Judge.

Tried for rape, defendant appeals his conviction of aggravated assault with intent to commit rape. Held:

The sole enumeration asserts that the trial court erred in charging on the lesser offense of aggravated assault with intent to commit rape.

The victim testified that the defendant had sexual intercourse with her against her will, after defendant slapped her in the face and displayed a knife. Defendant admitted the intercourse but denied using or offering to use any force or violence.

An assault is either an attempt to commit a violent injury to another or committing an act which places another in reasonable apprehension of immediately receiving a violent injury. OCGA § 16-5-20 (Code Ann. § 26-1301). An assault is necessarily included in every battery. Tuggle v. State, 145 Ga.App. 603(1), 244 S.E.2d 131. Any assault with the intent to commit rape is an aggravated assault. OCGA § 16-5-21 (Code Ann. § 26-1302).

"An assault, or assault and battery, is necessarily involved in every case of rape. [Cit.] In all cases where the defendant is charged with rape, and where the evidence under any view thereof, would authorize a conviction for a lesser offense necessarily involved in the graver charge, the jury should be instructed that he may be convicted of the lesser offense. [Cits.] Where all of the evidence shows either the completed offense as charged, or no offense, such evidence will not support a verdict for one of the lesser grades of the offense, and the court should not charge on the lesser grades of the offense." Sims v. State, 203 Ga. 668(2), 670, 47 S.E.2d 862.

"Under the provisions of Code Ann. §§ 26-1302 and 26-1303 [now OCGA §§ 16-5-21 and 16-5-22], the conviction of aggravated assault ... was a legal conviction ... upon an indictment for rape." Jones v. Smith, 228 Ga. 648(1), 187 S.E.2d 298.

Since the evidence does not show either rape or any offense, the trial court did not err in charging on aggravated assault with intent to commit rape. As the jury could find that the victim consented to the intercourse, after being assaulted by defendant, the evidence was sufficient to authorize a finding that the assault was with the intent to commit rape. Compare, Hardy v. State, ...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Wilson v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • February 15, 1990
    ...either the completed charged offense or no offense, and it was not error to refuse to charge on simple battery. See Terry v. State, 166 Ga.App. 632, 305 S.E.2d 170 (1983), and Tremble v. State, 162 Ga.App. 761, 762(3), 292 S.E.2d 442 (1982), which discuss this principle in the context of 2.......
  • Wolling v. Johnny Harris Restaurant, Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 13, 1983
    ... ... in a store that the proprietor has somehow been negligent would make the proprietor an insurer of his customer's safety which he is not in this state. [Cit.] 'What the law requires is not warranty of the safety of everybody from everything, but such diligence toward making the store safe as a ... ...
  • Jackson v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 9, 2002
    ...v. State, 196 Ga. 84, 112(12), 26 S.E.2d 263 (1943); accord Sims v. State, 203 Ga. 668, 670(2), 47 S.E.2d 862 (1948); Terry v. State, 166 Ga.App. 632, 305 S.E.2d 170 (1983); see Hillery, supra, 236 Ga.App. at 819(1), 513 S.E.2d 527. Indeed, when properly requested, "it is the duty of the ju......
  • Gunder v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 28, 1987
    ...the indictment necessarily involved criminal damage to property as defined in OCGA § 16-7-23 (a) (2). See generally Terry v. State, 166 Ga.App. 632, 305 S.E.2d 170 (1983). Hence, the trial court did not err in so charging and the jury conviction of the lesser offense was Judgment affirmed. ......
  • Get Started for Free