Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 08 Civ. 7611
Decision Date | 22 June 2012 |
Docket Number | 08 Civ. 7611,09 Civ. 8824 |
Parties | TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SANDOZ, INC., et al., Defendants. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., et al., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
(BSJ)(AJP)
(BSJ)(AJP)
Opinion and Order
II. The Patents-in-Suit.......................................9
B.
III. Procedural History and Claim Construction .............. 18
A. July 2011 Inequitable Conduct Trial ....................20
B. September 2011 Infringement and Invalidity Trial ....... 22
A. Molecular Weight Claim Limitations ..................... 31
B. Process Limitations ....................................34
C. Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis ........................35
D. Pharmaceutical Composition ............................. 36 A. Multiple Sclerosis: The Disease ....................... 36
B. The Weismann Scientists' Discovery of Copolymer-1 ...... 38
C.
D. Discovery of the Process for Achieving Low Molecular Weight Copolymer-1 ..................................... 51
A. Polypeptide Chemistry .................................. 52
B. Synthesis of Copolymer-1 ...............................53
C. Size Exclusion Chromatography ..........................56
D. Level of Ordinary Skill in the Art .....................66
I. Infringement.............................................68 A. General Principles ..................................... 68
B. Findings of Fact as to Mylan ...........................71
C. Conclusions of Law as to Mylan's Product ...............84
D. Findings of Fact as to Sandoz .........................115
E. Conclusions of Law as to Sandoz's Product .............128
II. INVALIDITY DEFENSES ..................................... 143
B. Inequitable Conduct ................................... 160
INTRODUCTION
BARBARA S. JONES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION...................................................6
i. Teva's Witnesses......................................20ii. Defendants' Witnesses.................................22
V. Copolymer-1 and Multiple Sclerosis ....................... 36
DISCUSSION....................................................68
This case involves the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term...
To continue reading
Request your trial