Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. Seymour Nat. Bank

Decision Date25 July 1983
Docket NumberNo. 1-782A170,1-782A170
Citation451 N.E.2d 698
CourtIndiana Appellate Court
PartiesTEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION, Appellant-Defendant below, v. SEYMOUR NATIONAL BANK, as Administrator of the Estate of Earl Edward Howard, Deceased, Appellee-Plaintiff below, FENIX & SCISSON, INC., Appellant-Third Party Defendant below, v. TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION, Appellee-Third Party Plaintiff below.

John T. Sharpnack, Sharpnack, Bigley, David & Rumple, Columbus, for appellant Texas Eastern Transmission Corp.

Hugh Watson, Sharon Funcheon Murphy, Locke, Reynolds, Boyd & Weisell, Indianapolis, David S. McCrea, McCrea & McCrea, Bloomington, for appellant Fenix & Scisson, Inc.

Roger L. Pardieck, W. Brent Gill, Montgomery, Elsner & Pardieck, Seymour, Gary J. Clendening, Bunger, Harrell & Robertson, Bloomington, for appellee Seymour Nat. Bank.

STATON, Judge (writing by designation).

Seymour National Bank (bank), administrator of the estate of Earl Howard, sued Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation (Texas) seeking damages for the wrongful death of Howard. Texas sued Fenix & Scisson, Inc. (Fenix), alleging that the contract between Texas and Fenix required Fenix to indemnify Texas against such damages. Following a trial, the jury found for the bank in its suit against Texas and for Texas in its suit against Fenix. Texas and Fenix appeal. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether a landowner/contractee is liable for the wrongful death of an employee of an independent contractor performing intrinsically dangerous work .

Reversed.

Texas and Fenix executed a contract which provided for the creation of a cavern in which Texas planned to store natural gas. The contract contained an indemnity clause. While working the cavern, Earl Howard, an employee of Fenix, was killed when a slab of rock fell on him. The bank sued Texas alleging that its negligence caused Howard's death.

Although the general rule is that a contractee is not liable to an employee of an independent contractor, an exception has been recognized where the contract requires the performance of intrinsically dangerous work. Hale v. Peabody Coal Company (1976), 168 Ind.App. 336, 343 N.E.2d 316; Denneau v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Company (1971), 150 Ind.App. 615, 277 N.E.2d 8. However, this Court recently held that the liability of the contractee does not extend to employees of the independent contractor. Johns v. New York Blower Co. (1982), Ind.App., 442 N.E.2d 382, 386.

Our decision in Johns was handed down after judgment had been rendered in this case. 1 The bank argues that the Johns holding should not be applied in this case. 2 In general, pronouncements of common law made in judicial opinions rendered in civil decisions have retroactive effect, unless such pronouncement impairs contracts made or vested rights acquired in reliance on an earlier decision. Don Medow Motors, Inc. v. Grauman (1983), Ind.App., 446 N.E.2d 651, 654 (trans. pending ); Center School Township v. State ex rel. Board of School Commissioners of the City of Indianapolis (1898), 150 Ind. 168, 174-174, 49 N.E. 961, 963; Gramm v. Armour and Company (1971), 132 Ill.App.2d 1011, 1014, 271 N.E.2d 52, 55; cf. Gross v . Board of Commissioners of Whitley County (1902), 158 Ind. 531, 535, 64 N.E. 25, 27; Stephenson v. Boody (1894), 139 Ind. 60, 66, 38 N.E. 331, 333; Haskett v. Maxey (1893), 134 Ind. 182, 188, 33 N.E. 358, 359. The last judicial decision is considered to have stated the law as it always existed, Don Medow Motors, supra; Center School Township, supra, 150 Ind. at 173, 49 N.E. at 962-963; Stephenson, supra, 139 Ind. at 66, 38 N.E. at 333; therefore, a civil case is determined on the law...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Ray v. Schneider
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • October 4, 1988
    ...So.2d 339 (Fla.App.1984); Peone v. Regulus Stud Mills, Inc., 113 Idaho 374, 744 P.2d 102 (1987); Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation v. Seymour National Bank, 451 N.E.2d 698 (Ind.App.1983); Johns v. New York Blower Co., 442 N.E.2d 382 (Ind.App.1982); King v. Shelby Rural Electric Co-Op C......
  • Merritt v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • May 22, 1989
    ...extend to employees of an independent contractor performing the work. Bogard, 530 N.E.2d at 779; Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. Seymour National Bank, 451 N.E.2d 698, 699 (Ind.App.1983), trans. denied; Johns v. New York Blower Co., 442 N.E.2d 382, 388 (Ind.App.1982). 3 The same is true......
  • Davis v. Hoosier Energy Rural Elec. Co-op, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • March 22, 1994
    ...Restaurant, Inc., 530 N.E.2d 776, 779 (Ind.App. 1 Dist.1988), trans. denied (July 27, 1989); Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. Seymour National Bank, 451 N.E.2d 698, 699 (Ind.App. 1 Dist.1983); Johns, 442 N.E.2d at 388. Even if we were to assume for the sake of argument that the exception......
  • Pelletier v. Sordoni/Skanska Construction Co.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • February 11, 2003
    ...2d 339 (Fla. App. 1984); Peone v. Regulus Stud Mills, Inc., 113 Idaho 374, 744 P.2d 102 (1987); Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation v. Seymour National Bank, 451 N.E.2d 698 (Ind. App. 1983); Johns v. New York Blower Co., 442 N.E.2d 382 (Ind. App. 1982); King v. Shelby Rural Electric Co-O......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT