Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Dunlap
| Decision Date | 14 February 1934 |
| Docket Number | No. 2450.,2450. |
| Citation | Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Dunlap, 68 S.W.2d 664 (Tex. App. 1934) |
| Parties | TEXAS INDEMNITY INS. CO. v. DUNLAP et al. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Jefferson County; J. D. Campbell, Judge.
Suit by J. H. Dunlap and wife against the Texas Indemnity Insurance Company, insurance carrier, to recover compensation for the death of plaintiffs' son, Howard Dunlap, while employed by the Magnolia Petroleum Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and the defendant insurance carrier appeals.
Reversed and rendered.
Lipscomb & Lipscomb, of Beaumont, for appellant.
Samuel Belden and E. C. Gaines, both of Austin, for appellees.
This is a compensation case; Magnolia Petroleum Company was the employer; appellant, Texas Indemnity Insurance Company the compensation insurance carrier; Howard Dunlap, deceased, referred to in the testimony as "H. H. Bass," the employee, and his father and mother the compensation claimants. The case was tried in the district court of Jefferson county as an appeal by appellant from an adverse award of the Industrial Accident Board. The verdict of the jury was that: (a) Dunlap died on or about the 15th day of March, 1930, "as the result of the injuries received in the course of his employment"; (b) good cause was shown "for failure of claimants to file their claim prior to March 21, 1931"; (c) hardship would result to claimants if the compensation is not paid in a lump sum; (d) prior to his death the deceased did not "willingly and actively participate in horseplay or frolic with C. K. Gibbs"; (e) immediately prior to his death deceased was not "engaged in an unlawful attempt to injure his coemployee Gibbs"; (f) the death of the deceased was not caused by the act of a third person intended to injure him, "because of reasons personal to him and not directed against him as an employee or because of his employment." Judgment was entered in favor of the claimants, in accordance with the verdict of the jury.
Appellant insists that appellees' petition and cross-action was subject to the general demurrer, and that under all the evidence it was entitled to an instructed verdict. The point made is that under the pleadings and the undisputed evidence the deceased, Howard Dunlap, at the time of his death, was aggressively engaged in a personal encounter with C. K. Gibbs, a fellow employee; that he resented a practical joke perpetrated upon him by Gibbs, and in doing so he voluntarily turned aside from his employment and willingly engaged in a fight with Gibbs, which resulted in his death; that the evidence was insufficient to raise the issue that he died "in the course of his employment." As appellees' petition in cross-action was sufficient to support the introduction of all the evidence offered by them and appellant's answer supported the proposition now advanced on this appeal, it is not necessary to discuss the pleadings of either party, but the merits of the appeal can be determined by a review of the testimony. The only evidence in the record on the issue raised by appellant's propositions consists of the following written statements by James A. Redmond, C. H. Shawver, J. S. Yancey, and C. K. Gibbs, the four eyewitnesses to the unfortunate tragedy. These statements were taken for submission to the Industrial Accident Board. James A. Redmond testified as follows:
C. H. Shawver testified as follows:
J. S. Yancey testified as follows:
C. K. Gibbs testified as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State ex rel. Atty. Gen. v. Ward
...v. Bryan, Tex.Civ.App., 210 S.W.2d 455, 464; Washington v. McLawhorn, 237 N.C. 449, 454, 75 S.E.2d 402; Lee v. Walker, 234 N.C. 287, 68 S.W.2d 664, 670; City of Quincy v. Sturhahn, 18 Ill.2d 604, 165 N.E.2d 271, 277; State of Illinois v. Illinois Central Railroad Co., 246 Ill. 188, 235, 92 ......
-
Mining v. Davison
...589, 196 P. 853; Hollenbach v. Hollenbach, 181 Ky. 262, 204 S. W. 152, 13 A.L.R. 524, and note 540. See, also, Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Dunlap (Tex. Civ. App.) 68 S. W. 2d 664; Derhammer v. Detroit News, 229 Mich. 658, 202 N. W. 958; Industrial Commission of Ohio v. Bankes, 127 Ohio St. ......
-
Horn v. Garage
...196 P. 853; Hollingbach v. Hollingbach, 181 Ky. 262, 204 S. W. 152, 13 A. L. R. 524, and note 540. See, also, Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Dunlap (Tex. Civ. App.) 68 S. W. 2d 664; Derhammer v. Detroit News, 229 Mich. 658, 202 N. W. 958; Industrial Commission of Ohio v. Bankes (Ohio) 189 N. E......
-
Horn v. Broadway Garage
...958; Industrial Commission of Ohio v. Bankes, 127 Ohio St. 517, 189 N.E. 437; In re Moore, 225 Mass. 258, 114 N.E. 204. In Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Dunlap, supra, it is said : "It is the law of this state that employee is entitled to compensation for an injury received in horseplay where......