Texas v. Parrish

Decision Date04 October 1993
Docket NumberNo. 92-1826.,92-1826.
Citation510 U.S. 801
PartiesTexas v. Parrish.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Appeal from the Ct. Crim. App. Tex.

Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Dixon, 509 U. S. 688 (1993). Reported below: 872 S. W. 2d 224.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Saldano v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 13 Marzo 2002
    ...have no right of appeal in criminal cases"). 34. Faulder v. Hill, 612 S.W.2d 512 (Tex.Cr. App.1980). 35. See Texas v. Parrish, 510 U.S. 801, 114 S.Ct. 41, 126 L.Ed.2d 11 (1993) (District Attorney of Harris County); Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 109 S.Ct. 2533, 105 L.Ed.2d 342 (1989) (Crim......
  • Saldano v State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 13 Marzo 2002
    ...State shall have no right of appeal in criminal cases"). 34 Faulder v. Hill, 612 S.W.2d 512 (Tex. Cr. App. 1980). 35 See Texas v. Parrish, 510 U.S. 801 (1993) (District Attorney of Harris County); Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989) (Criminal District Attorney of Dallas County); Texas v. ......
  • Parrish v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 8 Diciembre 1994
    ...of United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688, 113 S.Ct. 2849, 125 L.Ed.2d 556 (1993), which overruled Grady v. Corbin. Texas v. Parrish, 510 U.S. 801, 114 S.Ct. 41, 126 L.Ed.2d 11 (1993). On remand, in light of Dixon, the Court of Criminal Appeals held that the double jeopardy clause of the Unit......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT