Texas Workers' Compensation Com'n v. Garcia, D-1516
| Decision Date | 16 October 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. D-1516,D-1516 |
| Citation | 817 S.W.2d 60 |
| Parties | TEXAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION, et al., Appellants, v. Hector GARCIA, Jr., et al., Appellees. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Joe Pitner, Shannon H. Ratliff, Dan Morales, Delmar L. Cain, Harry G. Potter, III, Frank Oliver and Scott Moore, Austin, for appellants.
Robert Serna, Crystal City, Bill Whitehurst, David R. Richards, Austin, Robert R. Puente, San Antonio, for appellees.
This is a direct appeal from a judgment of the district court declaring the Texas Workers' Compensation Act 1 void as violative of various provisions of the Texas Constitution. Appellants have filed a statement of jurisdiction; appellees have responded. See TEX.R.APP.P. 140(c).
"An appeal may be taken directly to the supreme court from an order of a trial court granting or denying an interlocutory or permanent injunction on the ground of the constitutionality of a statute of this state." TEX.GOV'T CODE § 22.001(c); see TEX. CONST. art. V, § 3-b. The only injunctive relief sought in this case was by appellees against three parties: the Texas Workers Compensation Commission, its executive director, and a private employer. At trial, appellees orally withdrew their injunctive claims against two of those parties, the Commission and director. Accordingly, the district court never granted or denied injunctive relief against the Commission and its director. Appellees' remaining claim for injunctive relief against the private employer was not addressed specifically in the district court's judgment but effectively disposed of by its general provision "that all relief requested and not otherwise granted is hereby DENIED." The private employer has not appealed. Only the Commission and its director have appealed.
We have strictly construed our direct appeal jurisdiction, requiring that the trial court's ruling on the temporary or permanent injunction be "on the ground" of the statute's constitutionality or unconstitutionality. See Mitchell v. Purolater Security, Inc., 515 S.W.2d 101 (Tex.1974); Gibraltar Sav. Ass'n v. Falkner, 162 Tex. 633, 351 S.W.2d 534 (1961); cf. Martinez v. Rodriguez, 608 S.W.2d 162, 163-64 (Tex.1980). It is far from clear in this case that the district court's general denial of injunctive relief against the private employer was related to its determination that the Act is unconstitutional. Assuming that it was, however, that denial may not be used to invoke direct appeal jurisdiction when the private employer has not perfected its own appeal.
Appellants argue that a grant of declaratory relief against a state agency, which is the relief granted against the Commission in this case, is akin to an injunction. Whatever the similarities in effect, however, the simple granting of declaratory relief against a state agency is not sufficient to invoke...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Texas Workers' Compensation Com'n v. Garcia
...injunctive relief against any of the parties to the appeal based on the constitutionality of the statute. See Texas Workers' Compensation Comm'n v. Garcia, 817 S.W.2d 60 (Tex.1991). Defendants subsequently perfected an appeal to the court of The court of appeals affirmed the judgment of the......
-
Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth v. Episcopal Church
...“[t]he effect of the trial court's order ... is what determines this Court's direct appeal jurisdiction.” Tex. Workers' Compensation Comm'n v. Garcia, 817 S.W.2d 60, 61 (Tex.1991). In its motion for summary judgment TEC argued, in part, that the actions of the Board of Trustees in amending ......
-
Perry v. Del Rio
...a statute" (emphasis added). We have always strictly construed our direct appeal jurisdiction. See, e.g., Texas Workers' Compensation Comm'n v. Garcia, 817 S.W.2d 60, 61 (Tex.1991); Mitchell v. Purolator Security, Inc., 515 S.W.2d 101 (Tex.1974); Gardner v. Railroad Comm'n, 160 Tex. 467, 33......
-
Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth v. Episcopal Church
...16. Del Rio, 67 S.W.3d at 98-100 (Phillips, C.J., dissenting). 17. Id. at 89, 95 (majority opinion). 18. See Tex. Workers' Comp. Comm'n v. Garcia, 817 S.W.2d 60 (Tex. 1991); Querner Truck Lines, Inc. v. State, 652 S.W.2d 367, 368 (Tex. 1983); Mitchell v. Purolator Sec., Inc., 515 S.W.2d 101......