Texasgulf Inc. v. Colt Electronics Co., 81 Civ. 7147

Decision Date16 November 1984
Docket Number82 Civ. 0816,83 Civ. 1082,82 Civ. 6297,82 Civ. 3640,82 Civ. 3913,No. 81 Civ. 7147,82 Civ. 6459,83 Civ. 3663 and 83 Civ. 5323 (GLG).,82 Civ. 4997,82 Civ. 6296,83 Civ. 3662,82 Civ. 3912,82 Civ. 5278,83 Civ. 1083,82 Civ. 3045,81 Civ. 7147
Citation615 F. Supp. 648
PartiesTEXASGULF INC. and Texasgulf Aviation, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. COLT ELECTRONICS CO., INC., Phoenix Aerospace, Inc., the Garrett Corporation, Lockheed Corporation, and the United States of America, Defendants. And Related Actions.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

Whitman & Ransom, New York City (Kevin Keating and Richard F. Lawler, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs Mary V. Drew and Mary L. McKee.

Kreindler & Kreindler, New York City (Milton G. Sincoff and Steven Earl Anderson, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs Morgan Guaranty (Fogarty), Woodling and Claydon.

Speiser & Krause, P.C., New York City (Frank H. Granito, Jr., New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff Constance A. Boyle.

Costello & Shea, New York City (J. Donald Tierney, New York City, of counsel) and Perkins, Coie, Stone, Olsen & Williams, Seattle, Wash. (Keith Gerrard, Richard C. Coyle and Sherilyn Peterson, Seattle, Wash., of counsel), for defendant and third-party plaintiff Garrett Corp.

Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, New York City (B. Jennifer Jaffee, New York City, of counsel) and Blackwell Sanders Matheny Weary & Lombardi, Kansas City, Mo. (Timothy W. Triplett, Kansas City, Mo., of counsel), for defendant and third-party plaintiff Colt Electronics Co., Inc.

Donovan Leisure Newton & Irvine, New York City (James L. Stengel, New York City, of counsel) and Morris, Larson, King, Stamper & Bold, Kansas City, Mo. (Steven G. Emerson, Kansas City, Mo., of counsel), for defendant and third-party plaintiff Phoenix Aerospace, Inc.

Mendes & Mount, New York City (Kevin F. Cook, James W. Hunt and James M. Fitzsimons, New York City, of counsel), for defendant and third-party plaintiff Lockheed Corp.

J. Paul McGrath, Asst. Atty. Gen., John S. Martin, Jr., U.S. Atty., Dept. of Justice, Torts Branch, Civil Div. by Kathlynn G. Fadely and Susan M.H. Gillett, Trial Attys., Washington, D.C., for defendant U.S.

Townley & Updike, New York City (Frederick D. Berkon, John C. Sabetta, Michael Belohlave and James Altieri, New York City, of counsel), for defendants and third-party defendants TexasGulf Inc. and TexasGulf Aviation Inc.

FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

GOETTEL, District Judge:

This Court must determine the liability, if any, of the United States of America for an airplane crash. The following are the Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a):

FINDINGS OF FACT

On February 11, 1981, a Lockheed JetStar, owned and operated by Texasgulf Aviation, Inc., crashed at approximately 6:40 p.m. EST during an instrument landing system approach, a mile short of Runway 16 at the Westchester County Airport, White Plains, New York. All six passengers on board and the two man crew perished in the crash.

Actions were filed against several parties: the owner/operator of the aircraft, Texasgulf Inc. and Texasgulf Aviation, Inc.; four product defendants, Colt Electronics Co., Inc., Phoenix Aerospace, Inc., the Garrett Corporation, and the Lockheed Aircraft Corporation; and the United States of America. The plaintiffs are representatives of the six passengers on board the aircraft,1 and Texasgulf Inc. and Texasgulf Aviation, Inc. (the "Texasgulf Companies") for the loss of "the hull" (i.e., the aircraft). The United States is a direct defendant in Federal Tort Claims actions brought by these plaintiffs, and a third-party plaintiff, third-party defendant, and fourth-party defendant in other actions based on claims for contribution and indemnity. Allegations against the United States pertain to negligence on the part of air traffic controllers at the Westchester Air Traffic Control Tower.2

The consolidated actions were tried before a jury over a period of two months and two weeks,3 with the Court reserving the claims against the United States for its decision. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs, finding the Texasgulf Companies 70% responsible, Garrett 20% responsible, and Colt and Phoenix each 5% responsible.

The plaintiffs claimed, inter alia, that the aircraft crashed due to a loss of electrical power approximately three miles4 from the end of Runway 16 and while the aircraft was in instrument meteorological conditions. Claims against the product defendants rested, inter alia, on allegations that generator control units installed on the aircraft some two weeks before the accident were incompatible with the Lockheed JetStar electrical system, that the installation was negligently performed, and that the generator control units caused generators on board the aircraft to trip off the line resulting in a loss of electrical power when the back up batteries, which were worn down by earlier usage, also failed. Various claims were made by some of the plaintiffs, and all of the defendants, against the Texasgulf Companies charging negligence in the maintenance and operation of the plane. The theory against the United States was that the air traffic controllers at the Westchester County tower saw on their radar scopes the aircraft begin to deviate to the right of the localizer course, and negligently failed to warn the aircraft of its position in relation to the localizer course. The product defendants and the United States claimed that the cause of the accident was not an electrical failure, but was negligence on the part of the crew in continuing the approach into wind shear and severe turbulence which caused the aircraft to crash about one mile from the runway threshold and one-third of a mile right of course.5

The Aircraft

The accident aircraft was a Lockheed 1329-731 JetStar, serial number 5084, civil aircraft registration number N520S. From 1974 until the time of the accident, Texasgulf Aviation, Inc. ("TGA"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Texasgulf Inc., was the registered owner of the aircraft.6 The aircraft originally was manufactured and sold by the Lockheed Corporation in 1966 as a Lockheed Model 1329 JetStar. In 1976, the aircraft underwent a conversion at the Garrett Corporation AiResearch facilities in California, wherein the original engines were replaced with four Garrett TFE-731 fan jet engines. The JetStar 731 aircraft is a transport category aircraft, a model and type frequently used in corporate or business jet operations. It is certificated by the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") for operation by two pilots, and is equipped with dual controls so that each pilot has the ability to fly and operate the aircraft from either seat.

The aircraft, as originally equipped, was installed with carbon pile generator control units ("GCUs"). This component part provides the basic functions of regulating voltage produced by a generator and sensing voltage abnormalities. There are five generators on the aircraft that produce electrical energy — four powered by the ship's jet engines and an auxiliary fifth that provides power on the ground when the engines are not running. The electric power so generated is used to heat and light the aircraft and operate the communications, navigation, and electronic equipment. Both the accident aircraft and its sister ship, N320S, were identically equipped.7 In June 1980, Garrett installed on N320S solid state GCUs designed by Phoenix Aerospace and sold by Colt Electronics under a Supplemental Type Certificate held by it. This installation was ordered by J. Morgan "Lefty" Gregory, President of TGA and pilot-in-command on the accident flight. There were a few incidents of generators tripping on N320S. Garrett repaired the system.8

In January 1981, Gregory sent N520S to Garrett's AiResearch facility at MacArthur Airport, Islip, Long Island, for the purpose of having extensive maintenance and inspections performed. (The Texasgulf maintenance crew was capable of doing only routine minor maintenance.) This maintenance also included replacement of the existing carbon pile GCUs with installation of the Phoenix solid state GCUs. Problems arose during the installation process. After the installation, a ground runup of the new GCU installation was performed on January 30, 1981. The number four generator tripped off the line, the number four GCU smoked and was replaced, and other problems were encountered. After some further adjustments to the installation were made, test flights were conducted on January 31, 1981, by the Chief Pilot of TGA, Jimmy Markham. On the first two test flights, there were generator trips, including one instance when all four generators were off line. (They were reset by battery power.) Additional maintenance was performed. On the third test flight, the crew attempted to overload the electrical system of the aircraft to see if generators would trip. The generators did not trip, and Markham accepted the aircraft and flew it back to the Texasgulf hangar at Westchester County.

On February 1, 1981, Markham flew N520S to Midway Airport, Chicago, Illinois. During the flight, the number two generator tripped off the line twice and was reset without difficulty both times. On the return flight on February 3, the weather conditions required that the pilot fly under Instrument Flight Rules ("IFR").9 Markham experienced three generators tripping on climbout; two were reset and another was left off. Later in the flight, these two generators tripped again. Markham again reset two of the generators. After this flight, Markham told his superior, Gregory, that he (Markham) would not fly the aircraft again unless the generator tripping situation was corrected.

On February 5, 1981, the aircraft flew to Wilmington, Delaware, during daylight visual conditions. On the return flight, first one and then two generators tripped off line and were reset.

When the aircraft returned from...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Hurd v. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • March 8, 2001
    ... ... No. CIV. A. 2:99-0240-18 ... No. CIV. A. 2:99-0241-18 ... 1978); Texasgulf, Inc. v. Colt Electronics Co., Inc., 615 F.Supp ... Page 757 ... (Deposition of Daponte at 81; Plaintiffs' Exhibit 17, NTSB Report, Unsworn ... ...
  • Sexton v. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • December 18, 2000
    ... ... No. 99-102-CIV-ORL-3ABI(22) ... United States District Court, ... 797, 104 S.Ct. 2755, 81 L.Ed.2d 660 (1984), and Berkovitz by Berkovitz ... jurisdiction); Mid-South Holding Company, Inc. v. United States, 225 F.3d 1201, 1207 (11th ... See Indian Towing Co. v. United States, 350 U.S. 61, 68 — 69, 76 ... Texasgulf Inc. v. Colt Electronics Co., 615 F.Supp. 648, ... ...
  • McKee v. Colt Electronics Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • May 27, 1988
    ... ... Lockheed Corporation, ... Third-Party Plaintiffs, ... TEXASGULF, INC., and Texasgulf Aviation, Inc., Third-Party ... Defendants- ... Co., 282 F.2d 34, 38-39 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 870, 81 S.Ct. 115, 5 L.Ed.2d 93 (1960). In McWeeney, we held that "where the ... give some charge or, perhaps better, use the tools provided by Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 49," and set aside an excessive verdict. Id. at 38. From this ... ...
  • Morgan Guar. Trust Co. of NY v. Garrett Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • January 6, 1986
    ...in greater detail in this Court's decisions in Gregory v. Garrett Corp., 578 F.Supp. 871 (S.D.N.Y.1983), and Texasgulf Inc. v. Colt Electronics Co., 615 F.Supp. 648 (S.D.N.Y.1984). See also Gregory v. Garrett Corp., 589 F.Supp. 296 2 Although TGA is a wholly owned subsidiary of Texasgulf, t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT