Thacher v. Cook

Decision Date22 October 1924
Citation145 N.E. 256,250 Mass. 188
PartiesTHACHER v. COOK, Secretary of Commonwealth.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Report from Supreme Judicial Court, Middlesex County.

Petition by Frank G. Thacher for writ of mandamus to be directed against Frederic W. Cook, as Secretary of Commonwealth, to compel him to place name of petitioner on ballot as candidate of Republican party for election to office of County Commissioner for County of Barnstable. On report. Petition dismissed.H. F. R. Dolan and J. H. Morson, both of Boston, for petitioner.

A. Lincoln, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

RUGG, C. J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the secretary of the commonwealth to place upon the official ballot, to be used in the county of Barnstable at the state election on the 4th of November next, the name of the petitioner as a candidate of the Republican party for the office of county commissioner, and to desist from placing upon that ballot the name of Benjamin F. Bourne as such candidate. The essential facts are that the petitioner is a resident of the town of Barnstable in the county of Barnstable. At the primaries held on the 9th day of September last, the name of the petitioner appeared upon the official ballot as a candidate for the Republican nomination for the office of county commissioner of the county of Barnstable, as did also the names of John D. W. Bodfish of said Barnstable, Benjamin F. Bourne of Bourne and Arthur Underwood of Falmouth, all within said county. As a result of the primary as certified to the secretary of the commonwealth Bodfish received 1,945 votes, the petitioner 1,887 votes, Bourne 1,769 votes, and Underwood 1,127 votes. Thereupon the respondent determined to place upon the official ballot for the state election in Barnstable county as candidate of the Republican party for the two vacancies in office of county commissioners the names of Bodfish and Bourne and to omit from the official ballot the name of the petitioner.

The pertinent provisions of the statutes are that two persons are this year to be elected county commissioners for the county of Barnstable. G. L. c. 54, § 158. The same section provides that ‘not more than one of the county commissioners * * * shall be chosen from the same city or town.’ By G. L. c. 50, §§ 1, 2, in elections of county officers, ‘the person receiving the highest number of votes for an office shall be deemed and declared to be elected to such office; and if two or more are to be elected to the same office, the several persons, to the number to be chosen to such office, receiving the highest number of votes, shall be deemed and declared to be elected. * * *’ That statute governs primaries, G. L. c. 53, § 24. These words are found in G. L. c. 53, § 1:

‘At any primary, caucus or convention held...

To continue reading

Request your trial
26 cases
  • Com. v. Colon-Cruz
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • October 18, 1984
    ... ... Marrone, 387 Mass. 702, 704, 442 N.E.2d 735 (1982), quoting Thacher v. Secretary of the Commonwealth, 250 Mass. 188, 190-191, 145 N.E. 256 (1924). See also Commonwealth v. Vickey, 381 Mass. 762, 767, 412 N.E.2d 877 ... ...
  • Libertarian Ass'n of Mass. v. Sec'y of the Commonwealth
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • June 18, 2012
  • Wells v. State ex rel. Miller
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • September 15, 2016
  • In re West
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • January 28, 1943
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT