Thacker v. Garrison

Decision Date06 October 1975
Docket NumberNo. 74--1518,74--1518
Citation527 F.2d 1006
PartiesRobert Lee THACKER, Appellant, v. Sam P. GARRISON, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, N.C. and State of North Carolina, Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

Stuart Stiller, Washington, D.C., Scott N. Fein (third-year law student) (Sherman L. Cohn, Washington, D.C. (court-appointed counsel), on brief), for appellant.

Richard N. League, Asst. atty. Gen. (Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. of North Carolina, on brief), for appellees.

Before CLARK * United States Supreme Court Justice, Retired, HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and FIELD, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee Thacker, a North Carolina prisoner, seeks a certificate of probable cause to appeal the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus.

Briefly stated, the factual background is as follows. Thacker was arrested on March 10, 1971, and charged with two counts of assault. He was tried in the state court, and on June 21, 1971, was found guilty of both charges and received a sentence of nine to ten years in Case No. 71--CR--12806 and two years in Case No. 71--CR--12807. Thacker was committed to the State Department of Correction on June 23, 1971, to begin service of the nine- to ten-year sentence, with service of the two-year sentence to commence upon his completion of the longer sentence.

Thacker appealed both of these convictions and on June 26, 1972, the Supreme Court of North Carolina affirmed the conviction in Case No. 12807 (the two-year sentence), but reversed in Case No. 12806 (the nine- to ten-year sentence) and remanded for a new trial. State v. Thacker, 281 N.C. 447, 189 S.E.2d 145 (1972). Incident to its disposition of the appeals, the court directed that Thacker's commitment be adjusted as follows:

'Inasmuch as the valid judgment of imprisonment for two years in Case No. 71--CR--12807 (Pierce) was specified to begin at the termination of the nine- to ten-year sentence imposed in Case No. 71--CR--12806 (Waddell), which is now vacated, Case No. 71--CR--12807 (Pierce) must be remanded to the Superior Court of Wake County to the end that the judgment may be modified so as to provide that the two-year sentence shall commence on the date defendant began serving the nine- to ten-year sentence in the Waddell case. The effect will be, and it is so intended, that defendant will receive credit in the Pierce case for all time heretofore served on the now vacated nine- to ten-year sentence in the Waddell case. A revised commitment shall issue accordingly. If defendant is again convicted in the Waddell case the sentence imposed therein may run consecutively or concurrently with the time remaining to be served in the Pierce case, as the court in its discretion may determine.' 189 S.E.2d at 152.

Pursuant to the remand Case No. 12806 was retried and Thacker was found guilty. Upon this conviction he again received a nine- to ten-year sentence with the provision, however, that service thereof should commence upon Thacker's completion of the two-year sentence in Case No. 12807. Service of that sentence was completed on August 27, 1972, and, accordingly, on that date Thacker began serving the sentence imposed in Case No. 12806.

In his petition for habeas corpus Thacker claims that the time which he spent in service of his original nine- to ten-year sentence in Case No. 12806 must be credited against his present...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Steve v. Commissioner of Correction
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • September 26, 1995
    ...not intend its decision to be construed as entitling a prisoner to double credit for time served. See in accord, Thacker v. Garrison, 527 F.2d 1006 (4th Cir.1975) (per curiam)." Id., at Likewise in Thacker v. Garrison, supra, 527 F.2d at 1007-1008, where the petitioner's conviction and sent......
  • Lamar v. Tegels
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Wisconsin
    • September 28, 2015
    ...did not receive separate sentence credit on each originally concurrent sentence. Id. at 358-59. Another example is Thacker v. Garrison, 527 F.2d 1006, 1007 (4th Cir. 1975), in which the petitioner's conviction and sentence of nine to ten years was reversed on one count but the time he had a......
  • U.S. v. Markus, 641
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • August 3, 1979
    ...intend its decision to be construed as entitling a prisoner to Double credit for time served. 4 See in accord, Thacker v. Garrison, 527 F.2d 1006 (4th Cir. 1975) (per curiam). Appellant also argues that his sentence has been impermissibly increased in violation of the Due Process Clause. He......
  • Graham v. Commissioner of Correction
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • November 13, 1995
    ...supra, at 467-69, 665 A.2d 174, we based our ruling on United States v. Markus, 603 F.2d 409 (2d Cir.1979), and Thacker v. Garrison, 527 F.2d 1006 (4th Cir.1975) (per curiam), which ruled that North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969), precluded imposition......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT