Thaddeus-X v. Blatter, THADDEUS-X
| Decision Date | 12 June 1997 |
| Docket Number | THADDEUS-X,No. 95-1837,95-1837 |
| Citation | 110 F.3d 1247 |
| Parties | AND EARNEST BELL, JR., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BLATTER, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, KENNEDY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE and COLE, Circuit Judges.
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and the case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
It is further ORDERED that the appellant file a supplemental brief not later than Friday, August 22, 1997, and the appellee file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, September 22, 1997. The Clerk will schedule this case for argument as directed by the court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Thaddeus-X v. Blatter
-
Glover v. Johnson
...other prisoner retaliation claims have recently come before us on appeal based on a cursory examination of our docket: Thaddeus-X v. Blatter, 110 F.3d 1247 (6th Cir.1997) (now under en banc consideration), and White v. McGinnis, 131 F.3d 593 (6th Cir.1997). See also the recent class action ......
- Sun Valley, Ltd. v. Galyan's Trading Co.