Thames v. Oklahoma Historical Soc., 85-2537

Decision Date29 January 1987
Docket NumberNo. 85-2537,85-2537
Citation809 F.2d 699
PartiesDoris J. THAMES, a/k/a Doris Thames, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. OKLAHOMA HISTORICAL SOCIETY, an Oklahoma Corporation; Fred A. Olds, Appellees-Defendants.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma; Luther B. Eubanks, Judge.

Steven M. Angel of Hughes and Nelson, Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant-plaintiff.

Thomas R. Williams, Guthrie, Okl. and Michael W. Elliott, Asst. Atty. Gen., State of Okl. (Michael C. Turpen, Atty. Gen., State of Okl., with them on the brief), for appellees-defendants.

Before LOGAN and SEYMOUR, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Senior Judge. *

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the records and briefs and considered the arguments advanced by counsel.

We have also examined the Order and Judgment in accordance therewith by the District Court dated September 9, 1985, Dkt. No. 15 in Civil Action 85-1138-E for the Western District of Oklahoma. (646 F.Supp. 13). We have concluded the dismissal was warranted.

We affirm the Judgment of the District Court for the reasons contained in its written Order.

* Honorable Wesley E. Brown, United States District Senior Judge for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Rice v. State
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Kansas
    • May 26, 2011
    ...F.3d 1247, 1251-1252 (10th Cir. 2003); Thames v. Oklahoma Historical Soc'y, 646 F.Supp.13, 16 (W.D.Okla. 1985), aff'd per curiam, 809 F.2d 699 (10th Cir. 1987). The requirement is not jurisdictional, but is instead a condition precedent to suit. Hiller, 327 F.3d at 1251-51. Accordingly, bec......
  • Proposed Change in EEOC Regulations Concerning Right-to-Sue Notices for Public Sector Employees, 99-22
    • United States
    • Opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel of the Department of Justice
    • October 7, 1999
    ... ... entities] at the Attorney General's door"); ... Thames v. Oklahoma Historical Soc'y, 646 F.Supp ... 13, 16 (W.D ... ...
  • Hiller v. Oklahoma ex rel. Used Motor Vehicle, No. 01-6402.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • May 6, 2003
    ...The district court determined that under Thames v. Okla. Hist. Soc., 646 F.Supp. 13, 16 (W.D.Okla.1985), aff'd per curiam, 809 F.2d 699, 700 (10th Cir.1987), the receipt of notice of the right to sue from the Attorney General rather than the EEOC, while not a jurisdictional matter, was "exp......
  • Brown v. Unified Sch. Dist. No.501
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Kansas
    • June 2, 2011
    ...the attention of the Attorney General." Thames v. Oklahoma Historical Soc y, 646 F. Supp. 13, 16 (W.D. Okla. 1985), aff'd per curiam, 809 F.2d 699, 700 (l0th Cir. 1987). The court finds that the failure to obtain prior approval specifically from the Attorney General is not fatal to Brown's ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT