Thatcher v. Powell

Decision Date12 February 1821
Citation19 U.S. 119,6 Wheat. 119,5 L.Ed. 221
PartiesTHATCHER et al. v. POWELL et al. Lessee
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

ERROR to the Circuit Court of West Tennessee.

This cause was argued at the last term, and at the present term the opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL.

This was an action of ejectment instituted by the defendants in error against the plaintiffs, to recover 640 acres of land in Montgomery county. Upon the trial in the Court below, the lessors of the plaintiffs, in support of their title, read in evidence a grant from the State of North Carolina to Stokeley Donaldson, dated the 12th of January, 1797; also a deed for the same land from the said Donaldson to John Love, dated the 13th of January, 1797, and registered in Montgomery county, on the 25th of July, 1815, upon a probate made in the County Court of Grange county, at May term of the said Court, 1814.

The defendants in that Court, to support their title, read in evidence a transcript of a record from the County Court of Montgomery county, at their July session of 1801, as follows, viz:

'Haydon Wells, who was appointed by the Court of January term, 1801, to receive the list of taxable property in Captain Boyd's company, reports to Court a list of taxable property in the county of Montgomery, not listed for the year 1799, nor taxes paid thereon, to wit: among others, 'Stokeley Donaldson 2,560 acres on Yellow Creek waters.'


'Ordered, that the clerk make out a certificate of lands and tenements reported by Haydon Wells, Esq. for the year 1799, that are liable to the payment of taxes, agreeably to the 14th section of 'an act to ascertain what property in this State shall be deemed taxable, and the mode of collecting, accounting for, and paying public taxes.' And now, to wit, at January term, 1802, the following proceedings were had thereon, to wit, on motion, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that the tracts of land entered in the names of the following persons, be subject to the payment of taxes due thereon, agreeably to report of Haydon Wells, Esq. receiver of taxable property, as delinquent for the year 1799, agreeably to law, and that execution issue accordingly:' (among others,) Stokeley Donaldson, 11 dollars 90 cents. Upon which order or judgment, an execution, bearing date the fourth Monday in March, 1802, was issued to the sheriff of Montgomery county, commanding him, that of the lands of Stokeley Donaldson, reported to be in arrears for taxes for the year 1799, he cause to be made the sum of 11 dollars 90 cents, as, also, the sum of 1 dollar 40 cents, and charges, &c. Upon this execution the sheriff made the following return:

'Levied on 2133, and advertised agreeably to the old; not sold, because the new act which requires it to be advertised in the Gazette did not come forward till the day of sale.

'JOHN SAUNDERS, Sheriff M. C.'

On the 1st of May, 1802, an alias execution issued, bearing date the fourth Monday in April, 1802, in the words of the former, on which the sheriff made the following return: 'The within land sold agreeably to law, on the 23d of July, 1802; at seven mills per acre.' They also read in evidence a deed from John Cocke, Sheriff of Montgomery county, to Samuel Vance, one of the defendants, dated the 14th of April, 1808, reciting, that whereas John Saunders, late Sheriff of Montgomery county, did, on the 23d of July, 1802, by virtue of an execution or order of sale, to him directed, from the Court of Montgomery county, expose to sale 2,560 acres of land granted to Stokeley Donaldson, or so much thereof as would be sufficient to satisfy the taxes due thereon for the year 1799, agreeably to an act of Assembly in such cases made and provided. And whereas Morgan Brown became the purchaser of 2,229 6-7 acres of the said land at seven mills per acre, he being the highest and best bidder, the taxes and costs due thereon being 17 dollars 10 cents; and the said Morgan Brown having authorized a deed to be made therefor to Samuel Vance: Now, the said John Cocke, in consideration of the said sum being paid to the said John Saunders, Sheriff, &c. doth sell and convey the said 2,229 6-7 acres of land, &c. The said deed then described one tract of 640 acres, the tract in question; also, two other tracts of 640 acres each; also, one other part of a survey of land of 309 acres granted to Stokeley Donaldson.

The lessors of the plaintiffs then introduced grants from the State of North Carolina to Stokeley Donaldson, all dated about the same time, for two different tracts of land of 640 acres each, a part of which are those described in the said Sheriff's deed, all lying upon the waters of Yellow Creek, and proved that the same lay in one connection of surveys adjoining each other, but those described in the Sheriff's deed were of much the greatest value.

Upon this evidence the Court instructed the jury, that it was for them to determine whether the said lands in the said Sheriff's deed mentioned, were the same lands which the former Sheriff Saunders had sold or not. If not the same land, then the said Sheriff's deed was not good in law. And the Court farther instructed the jury, that the said record, or any thing therein contained, was not sufficient in law to authorize the sale of the lands made by the said...

To continue reading

Request your trial
141 cases
  • Aandahl v. Great Northern Railway Co.
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • 11 January 1919
    ...of a statutory tribunal such as the Commission will not be extended by implication. Re Beckman Street, 20 Johns. 269; Thatcher v. Powell, 6 Wheat. 119; Kansas etc. R. o. v. Campbell, 62 Mo. 585. No authority existed at common law to compel a railroad to build stations or install agents. N. ......
  • Ballard v. Hunter
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 11 February 1905
  • The State v. Wear
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 25 June 1898
    ...v. Sunderland, 66 Am. Dec. 61; Denning v. Corwin, 11 Wend. 647; Jackson v. Estey, 7 Wend. 148; Striker v. Kelly, 7 Hill, 11; Thatcher v. Powell, 6 Wheat. 119; Gunn v. Howell, 27 Ala. 663; Bates v. Bank, Port, 99; Ford v. Bank, 9 Port, 471; Andrews v. Bank, 10 Ala. 375. (2) Where the record ......
  • Swedish-American National Bank of Minneapolis v. T. Bleecker
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • 31 May 1898
    ...res must appear affirmatively upon the record. Nothing is to be presumed in favor of the jurisdiction. Drake, Attachm. § 87b; Thatcher v. Powell, 6 Wheat. 119; Haywood Collins, 60 Ill. 328; Eaton v. Badger, 33 N.H. 228; Waples, Garn. 329; Star Brewery v. Otto, 63 Ill.App. 40. The garnishee ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT