The Abbotsford
Citation | 98 U.S. 440,25 L.Ed. 198 |
Parties | THE 'ABBOTSFORD.' |
Decision Date | 01 October 1878 |
Court | United States Supreme Court |
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Morton P. Henry for the 'Abbotsford.'
Mr. Henry Flanders and Mr. James B. Roney, contra.
This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in an admiralty cause on the instance side of the court, rendered April 13, 1876. The case was up for consideration once before at the present term, and remanded for a finding of the facts and the conclusions of law required by the (18 Stat. 315), which went into effect May 1, 1875. The Circuit Court has since complied with the requirements of that statute, and made its return, stating the facts and the conclusions of law separately. Accompanying this return is a bill of exceptions, which is now a part of the record. This bill of exceptions shows that each of the parties presented to the court requests for findings of fact upon the evidence, and the exceptions are to the effect that the court neglected to find certain facts claimed by the appellant to have been proved. The evidence relied upon to prove what was claimed and not found is set out at length.
The first question to be determined is as to the operation and effect of the bill of exceptions. The act of 1875 provides
Under this statute we are clearly of the opinion that the finding of facts in the Circuit Court is conclusive, and that the only rulings which can be presented for review here by bill of exceptions are those made upon questions of law. Such has been the construction given by this court to statutes of a similar character in a long line of decisions, commencing soon after the court was organized. Thus, sect. 19 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 provided that it should 'be the duty of the Circuit Court, in causes in equity and of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, to cause the facts on which they found their sentence or decree fully to appear upon the record, either from the pleadings and decree itself, or a state of the case agreed by the parties or their counsel, or if they disagree, by a stating of the case by the court.' 1 Stat. 83. In Wiscart v. Dauchy (3 Dall. 324), decided in 1796, Chief Justice Ellsworth, speaking for the court in reference to the proper practice under this act, said: Soon afterwards the act of 1803 (2 Stat. 244), allowing appeals, was passed, which directed that, upon an appeal, 'a transcript of the libel, bill, answer, depositions, and all other proceedings of what kind soever in the cause,' should be transmitted to this court, and consequently the question did not again come up for consideration until after the (4 Stat. 62), passed May 26, 1824. Under the Louisiana practice, which was adopted by this act for the courts of the United States in that district, trials were allowed by the court without a jury, and almost immediately questions arose as to the manner in which such cases should be brought to this court for review by writ of error. There was much difficulty in reaching a settlement of the practice, but in United States v. King (7 How. 845), it was decided unanimously 'that the decision of the Circuit Court upon the questions of fact must, like the finding of a jury, be regarded as conclusive; that the writ of error can bring up nothing but questions of law.' Following this was the case of Bond v. Brown (12 id. 256), where Mr. Chief Justice Taney said: Other cases to the same effect may be found. Such is now the settled law with reference to trials of issues of fact in Louisiana, when a review is sought in this court by writ of error.
In 1865 an act of Congress was passed (13 Stat. 501), which is as follows:——
This statute has been reproduced in sects. 649 and 700 of the Revised Statutes, and under it we have universally held that a bill of exceptions cannot be used to bring up the evidence for a review of the findings of fact. The facts, as found and stated by the court below, are conclusive. The case stands here precisely the same as though they had been found by the verdict of a jury. Norris v. Jackson, 9 Wall. 125; Basset v. United States, id. 38; Copelin v. Insurance Company, id. 461; Coddington v. Richardson, 10 id. 516; Miller v. Insurance Company, 12 id. 295; Insurance Company v. Folsom, 18 id. 249; Insurance Company v. Sea, 21 id. 158; Jennisons v. Leonard, id. 302.
At the December Term, 1865, under the authority we have to prescribe rules by...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Westerlund v. Black Bear Min. Co.
... ... 830 ... A ... decisive canon of construction here, however, is that when a ... word which has a known legal meaning is used in a statute it ... must be assumed that the term is used in its legal sense, in ... the absence of an indication of a contrary intent. The ... Abbotsford, 98 U.S. 440, 444, 25 L.Ed. 168; McCool v ... Smith, 1 Black (U.S.) 459, 464, 470, 17 L.Ed. 218; ... United States v. Gilmore, 8 Wall. 330, 19 L.Ed. 396 ... The words 'incumber' and 'incumbering,' when ... used in reference to property and its title, are words of ... this character, and ... ...
-
United States v. Green
... ... a statute, which has a settled and well-known meaning ... sanctioned by judicial decision, is presumed to be used in ... that sense by the legislative body. ' Kepner v ... United States, 195 U.S. 100-124, 24 Sup.Ct. 797, 49 ... L.Ed.--; The Abbotsford, 98 U.S. 440, 25 L.Ed. 168 ... Applying ... that rule here, and we must assume that Congress in using the ... expressions 'contract,' 'undertaking,' ... 'obligation,' etc., ... [136 F. 651] ... 'for the payment of money,' used them in their legal ... sense, as determined by ... ...
-
Wiser v. Lawler
... ... to pass are such as might be presented by a bill of ... exceptions prepared as in actions at law, and that the ... findings have practically the same effect as the special ... verdict of a jury." The Clara, 102 U.S. 200, 26 L.Ed ... 145; The Abbotsford, 98 U.S. 440, 25 L.Ed. 168; The ... Benefactor, 102 U.S. 214, 26 L.Ed. 157; The Annie Lindsley, ... 104 U.S. 185, 26 L.Ed. 716; Collins v. Riley, 104 ... U.S. 322, 26 L.Ed. 752; Watts v. Camors, 115 U.S ... 353, 6 S.Ct. 91, 29 L.Ed. 406; The Gazelle, 128 U.S. 474, 9 ... S.Ct. 139, 32 ... ...
-
Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Company
... ... And the finding of such jury, unless set aside for lawful cause, shall be entered of record, and stand as the finding of the court, upon which judgment shall be entered according to law." See The Abbotsford, 98 U. S. 440, 25 L.Ed. 198 (1879). Benedict, American Admiralty (3d ed. 1900), p. 104, says that this statute was intended to deal with appeals to the circuit court but that the author had never heard of a case where a jury had been used. See also notes to 28 U.S.C. § 771 (1940 ed.) and Munson ... ...