The Atchison v. Ireton

Decision Date07 December 1901
Docket Number12,258
Citation66 P. 987,63 Kan. 888
CourtKansas Supreme Court
PartiesTHE ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY v. BRIDGET IRETON

Decided July, 1901.

Error from district court, Cowley county; W. T. McBride, Judge.

Action by Bridget Ireton against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error. Affirmed.

Argued before DOSTER, C. J., and JOHNSTON, SMITH, and ELLIS, JJ.

Whether there was negligence on the part of the landowner in permitting high grass and weeds to grow on the land adjacent to the right of way is a question for the jury in an action for damages by fire.

A. A. Hurd, and O. J. Wood, for plaintiff in error.

Hackney & Lafferty, for defendant in error.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

There was testimony showing that the fire was started immediately after the passing of one of the plaintiff in error's trains at the railroad. Whether there was negligence upon the part of the land owner in permitting high grass and weeds to grow upon her land adjacent to the right of way was a question of fact for the jury. Railway Co. v. Richardson, 47 Kan. 517, 28 P. 183; Railway Co. v. Tubbs, 47 Kan. 630, 28 P. 612; Kellogg v. Railway Co., 26 Wis. 223, 7 Am. Rep. 69; Railroad Co. v. Hendrickson, 80 Pa. 182, 21 Am. Rep. 97. See, also, Buck v. Railway. Co., 59 Kan. 328, 52 P. 866.

The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT