The Cadle Company v. Lisa

Decision Date20 December 2007
Docket Number2268N.
Citation46 A.D.3d 422,848 N.Y.S.2d 626,2007 NY Slip Op 10071
PartiesTHE CADLE COMPANY, Appellant, v. JAMES LISA, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Plaintiff moved for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3213 to domesticate a $13,230.05 judgment obtained in Superior Court of New Jersey upon defendant's default. Supreme Court, in essence, transferred the matter to Civil Court pursuant to CPLR 325 (d). While Supreme Court may, in its discretion, remove an action without consent to Civil Court where it appears that the amount of damages sustained may be less than demanded, Supreme Court may only do so where Civil Court would have jurisdiction but for the amount of damages demanded (CPLR 325 [d]). Where, as here, Civil Court may not have personal jurisdiction over the defendant, Supreme Court should not have transferred the action pursuant to CPLR 325 (d) (see Siegel, NY Prac § 27, at 30 [4th...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Chelsea 18 Partners, LP v. Sheck Yee Mak
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 3, 2011
    ...appropriately brought in Civil Court. Nestor, 81 N.Y.2d at 415, 599 N.Y.S.2d at 509, 615 N.E.2d 991; see also Cadle Co. v. Lisa, 46 A.D.3d 422, 848 N.Y.S.2d 626 (1st Dept.2007). In this case, however, Supreme Court improvidently exercised that discretion. It clearly failed to understand the......
  • Genson v. Sixty Sutton Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 15, 2010
    ...Court has subject matter jurisdiction over all transferred causes of action but for the amount in controversy ( cf. Cadle Co. v. Lisa, 46 A.D.3d 422, 848 N.Y.S.2d 626 [2007] ). Supreme Court did not improperly exercise its discretion in severing and retaining the cause of action for a decla......
  • Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co. v. Goggins-Starr
    • United States
    • New York District Court
    • November 30, 2010
    ...action was arguably improper under the jurisdictional limitations of CPLR 325(d) and UDCA § 404(a). See, e.g. Cadle Co. v. Lisa, 46 A.D.3d 422, 848 N.Y.S.2d 626 (1st Dept.2007) ("where, as here, Civil Court may not have personal jurisdiction over the defendant, Supreme Court should not have......
  • Matter of Steven J.K. v. Leah T.K.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 20, 2007
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT