The City of McPherson v. Manning
Decision Date | 01 January 1890 |
Citation | 23 P. 109,43 Kan. 129 |
Parties | THE CITY OF MCPHERSON v. E. J. MANNING |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Error from McPherson District Court.
ACTION to recover damages for bodily injuries. Judgment for plaintiff Manning for $ 1,000, at the April term, 1887. The defendant City brings the case here.
Judgment affirmed.
D. C Welch, M. P. Simpson, and W. J. Travis, for plaintiff in error.
Lucien Earle, and Thos. C. Sawyer, for defendant in error.
OPINION
Thus it will be seen, that error is not predicated on the overruling of a motion for a new trial; and the silence of the city in this respect must be regarded as an acquiescence in the ruling. All matters now complained of occurred during the trial of the action, and were subject to review upon the motion for a new trial. Such rulings can only be brought to this court after the district court has had an opportunity to reexamine and correct them upon a motion...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Riordan v. Horton
...(Okla.), 37 P. 586; Beal v. Ins. Co., 7 Okla. 285; Douglas Co. v. Sparks, 7 Okla. 259; Crawford v. Kansas City, 45 Kan. 474; McPherson v. Manning, 43 Kan. 129; Landauer v. Hoagland, 41 Kan. 520; Clark Schnur, 40 Kan. 72; Carson v. Frink, 27 Kan. 524; Binn v. Adams, 54 Kan.. 615; Coffeyville......
-
The Coffeyville Gas Company v. Dooley
... ... Adams, 54 Kan. 615, 38 P ... 792; Cogshall v. Spurry, 47 Kan. 448, 28 P. 154; ... City of McPherson v. Manning, 43 Kan. 129, 23 P ... The ... errors assigned raise questions ... ...
-
Duigenan v. Claus
... ... Hoagland, 41 Kan. 520, 21 P. 645; Bank v ... Jaffray, 41 Kan. 691, 19 P. 626; City of McPherson ... v. Manning, 43 Kan. 129, 23 P. 109 ... Errors ... occurring during ... ...
-
J. J. Douglas Co. v. Sparks
... ... Schnur, 40 Kan. 72, 19 P. 327; Landauer v ... Hoagland, 41 Kan. 520, 21 P. 645; City of McPherson v ... Manning, 43 Kan. 129, 23 P. 109." The petition in error ... will therefore be ... ...