The City of Wichita v. Anderson
Decision Date | 11 July 1925 |
Docket Number | 26,065 |
Citation | 237 P. 1024,119 Kan. 241 |
Parties | THE CITY OF WICHITA, Appellant, v. ED ANDERSON, County Treasurer of Sedgwick County, et al., Appellees |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Decided July, 1925.
Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 1; THOMAS E ELCOCK, judge.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.
TAXATION--Exemption--When Operative. Property purchased on October 13, 1922, by a city for public purposes is exempt from the payment of taxes for that year.
Robert C. Foulston and George Siefkin, both of Wichita, for the appellant.
I. N. Williams, county counselor, for the appellees.
The plaintiff commenced this action to enjoin the defendant as county treasurer of Sedgwick county and the other defendants as officers of that county, from levying a tax upon real property belonging to the city and from selling that property for the payment of those taxes. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.
On October 13, 1922, the plaintiff purchased real property known as Oak Park and immediately went into possession thereof and devoted the property to public park purposes. The deed was not recorded until October 31, 1923. The defendants are attempting to collect the taxes levied thereon for the year 1922.
Valuation, in listing property for taxation, is made during the months of March, April and May. Taxes for state purposes are apportioned in July of each year (R. S. 79-1409); taxes for county purposes are levied in August (R. S. 79-1802); and all city, township and school taxes must be certified to the county clerk prior to August 25 (R. S. 79-1801). Taxes become a lien on real property on the first day of November of each year (R. S. 79-1804).
Article 11, section 1, of the constitution, as amended in 1924, reads:
Part of section 79-201 of the Revised Statutes reads:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. City of St. Louis v. Baumann
...(4 Ed.), pp. 1419, 1420, sec. 677; Anne Arundel County Comrs. v. Mayor, etc., of Annapolis, 126 Md. 445, 95 A. 40; Wichita v. Anderson, 237 P. 1024, 119 Kan. 241. Where a municipal corporation purchases lands for delinquent taxes it is unnecessary for it to pay any taxes. Lancaster County v......
-
State ex rel. City of St. Louis v. Baumann, 36994.
...1420, sec. 677; Anne Arundel County Comrs. v. Mayor, etc., of Annapolis, 126 Md. 445, 95 Atl. 40; Wichita v. Anderson, 237 Pac. 1024, 119 Kan. 241. (2) Where a municipal corporation purchases lands for delinquent taxes it is unnecessary for it to pay any taxes. Lancaster County v. Trimble, ......
-
Madison County v. School Dist. 2 of Madison County
... ... its district boundaries including the city of Norfolk ... (population as of 1940, 10,490) and some adjacent territory ... The defendant ... presented to the Supreme Court of Kansas in City of Wichita ... v. Anderson, 119 Kan. 241, 237 P. 1024. That court held that ... the property was exempt, it ... ...
-
Board of County Com'rs v. United States
...Jaques, 20 Kan. 639, which stated that "until the 1st day of November they could hardly be said to be taxes". Accord City of Wichita v. Anderson, 119 Kan. 241, 237 P. 1024. Cf. Gachet v. City of New Orleans, 52 La.Ann. 813, 27 S. 348; City of Harlan v. Blair, 251 Ky. 51, 64 S.W.2d 434; Madi......