The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company v. Backus
Decision Date | 03 February 1893 |
Docket Number | 16,769 |
Citation | 33 N.E. 421,133 Ind. 513 |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
Parties | The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company v. Backus, Treasurer |
From the Marion Circuit Court.
Judgment affirmed.
A Baker, E. Daniels and J. T. Dye, for appellant.
A. G Smith, Attorney-General, S. Claypool, J. W. Kern, A. C Ayres, W. A. Ketcham and A. J. Beveridge, for appellee.
This is a suit brought by the appellant against the appellee, to enjoin the collection of taxes assessed against the appellant railway company, by the State Board of Tax Commissioners of Indiana. The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of Ohio and Indiana, and is, and has been for several years, engaged in the business of a common carrier of freight and passengers, and in operating a system of railroads in the States of Ohio, Indiana and Illinois, having various lines of railroads in Indiana, and its railroad track and rolling stock was assessed for taxation by the said State Board of Tax Commissioners, under the act of the Legislature of Indiana, approved March 6, 1891.
The principal question involved in this case relates to the constitutionality and validity of the law under which the appellant's property was assessed, though around this question cluster some others, which we will consider later on.
The act makes provision for the assessment of real and personal property by township and county assessors, creates a county board of equalization in each county in the State, and section 114 gives to such county boards "power to hear complaints of any owner of personal property, except 'railroad track' and 'rolling stock' of railroads, to equalize the valuation of property and taxables," and provides that it "shall pass upon each valuation, and may, on sufficient cause being shown, or on their own motion, correct the assessment or valuation of any property in such manner as will, in their judgment, make the valuation thereof just and equal," and provides (section 125) that "appeals shall lie from the decision of any county board of review to the State Board of Tax Commissioners, which shall hear and determine the same, in such manner as it may by its rules prescribe, and certify its decision, which shall be final, to the proper county auditor."
In relation to the assessment of railway property, the act provides:
Section 78. "Such right of way, including the superstructures, main, side or second track and turnouts, turntable, telegraph poles, wires, instruments, and other appliances, and the stations and improvements of the railroad company on such right of way (excepting machinery, stationary engines, and other fixtures, which shall be considered personal property) shall be held to be real estate for the purpose of taxation, and denominated 'railroad track,' and shall be so listed and valued, and shall be described in the assessment thereof as a strip of land extending on each side of such railroad track and embracing the same, together with all the stations and improvements thereon, commencing at a point where such railroad track crosses a boundary line in entering the county, township, city or town, tending to the point where such track crosses the boundary line leaving such county, township, city or town to the point of termination in the same, as the case may be, containing ----- acres, more or less (inserting name of county, township, city or town, or boundary line of same, and number of acres and length in feet), and when advertised or sold for taxes, no other description shall be necessary to convey a good title to the purchaser."
Section 79 declares that the railroad track shall be listed and taxed in the several counties, etc.
Section 80 declares that "the movable property belonging to a railroad company shall be held to be personal property, and denominated, for the purpose of taxation, 'rolling stock;' such rolling stock shall be listed and taxed in the several counties, townships, cities and towns in the proportion that the main track used or operated in such county, township, city or town bears to the length of the main track used or operated by such person, company or corporation, whether owned, operated or leased by him or them, in whole or in part."
Section 81 provides for the taxation of tools, materials for repairs, etc., in the county, township, city or town where the same may be on the 1st day of April of each year, and section 82 provides for the taxation of all real estate of any railroad, other than that denominated "railroad track," and improvements thereon as lands and lots in the county, township, city or town where situated.
Section 83 declares that between the 1st day of April and the 1st day of June of each year, "every person, company or corporation, owning, constructing or operating a railroad in this State shall return to the county auditor a list or schedule, verified by the oath of such person so owning, constructing or operating, if an individual, or if a company or corporation, by the oath of the superintendent or secretary of such company or corporation, which shall contain:
The third subdivision provides for an inventory of the real estate other than that denominated "railroad track."
Section 84 makes it the duty of county auditors to return to the proper assessors a copy of the lists as contained in the second and third specifications to be assessed by such assessors, the same to be treated in all respects in regard to assessment and equalization as other similar property belonging to individuals.
Section 85 reads as follows: "At the same time that the lists or schedules as hereinbefore required to be returned to the county auditor, the person, company or corporation running, operating or constructing any railroad in this State shall under the oath of such person, or the secretary or superintendent of such company or corporation, return to the auditor of State sworn statements or schedules, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Campbell v. State
...an opportunity to be heard before some tribunal, not necessarily an organized court, or before a jury. Cleveland, etc., R. Co. v. Backus, 133 Ind. 513, 33 N. E. 421, 18 L. R. A. 729;Hovey v. Elliott, 167 U. S. 409, 17 Sup. Ct. 841, 42 L. Ed. 215;Springer v. United States, 102 U. S. 586, 26 ......
-
Campbell v. The State
... ... Cleveland, etc., R. Co. v. Backus (1893), ... 133 Ind ... ...
-
Cleveland v. Backus
... ... A. Brown, Judge. Action by the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company against Victor M ... ...