The First National Bank of Girard v. Craig
Decision Date | 01 November 1895 |
Docket Number | 88 |
Parties | THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF GIRARD, KANSAS, v. H. G. CRAIG |
Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Error from district court, Crawford county; S. H. Allen, Judge.
December 4, 1895.
MEMORANDUM.--Error from Crawford district court; S. H. ALLEN judge. Action by H. G. Craig against The First National Bank of Girard, Kan. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings the case to this court. Affirmed. The opinion herein, filed December 4, 1895, states the material facts.
Judgment affirmed.
Fuller & Randolph, for plaintiff in error.
J. Q Stratton, for defendant in error.
OPINION
The facts as shown by the record in this case, briefly stated, are as follows: On January 6, 1889, the defendant in error, Craig, was indebted to the plaintiff in error in the sum of $ 900 and applied to it by letter for an additional loan of $ 700. He inclosed in said letter a note with the following instructions: Its receipt was acknowledged as follows:
A copy of said note is as follows:
$ 432.25. WALNUT, KAN., August 16, 1888.
Six months after date, for value received, I, as principal, promise to pay to the order of H. G. Craig, at the Bank of Walnut, Kan., $ 432.25, with interest thereon at the rate of 12 per cent. per annum from maturity, The drawers, indorsers and guarantors severally waive presentment for payment, protest or notice of protest of nonpayment of this note. Appraisement waived. GEORGE HILL.
This note secured by a chattel mortgage even date. Due February 16, 1889. No. 19735.
And it is indorsed upon the back as follows:
Shortly before the maturity of the note the plaintiff in error made the last indorsement on said note, and sent the same to J. V. Pierce, president of the Bank of Walnut, Kan., for collection. The note was paid by Hill, the maker, on the 19th of February, 1889, and on the next day the Bank of Walnut failed, and neither the said J. V. Pierce nor the Bank of Walnut has ever paid the plaintiff in error or any one else the amount collected from Hill, nor any part thereof.
The case was tried by the court without a jury, and its findings of fact and conclusions of law are fully set out in the following journal entry, to wit (omitting title):
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Barnes v. Bryce
...the note delivered to him as evidenced by the instrument. Bradstreet v. Everson, 72 Pa. 124, 13 Am. Rep. 665; First. Natl. Bank v. Craig, 3 Kan. App. 166, 42 Pac. 830. In the absence, therefore, of plea and proof that there was fraud, accident, or mutual mistake in the execution of the writ......