The German Insurance Company v. Allen

Decision Date07 July 1904
Docket Number13,762
Citation69 Kan. 729,77 P. 529
PartiesTHE GERMAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. MRS. J. H. ALLEN
CourtKansas Supreme Court

Decided July, 1904.

Error from Coffey district court; DENNIS MADDEN, judge.

Judgment affirmed.

SYLLABUS

SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.

1. INSURANCE POLICY -- "Iron-safe Clause" Waived by Agent. A provision in a fire-insurance policy that a merchant will keep books showing the purchase and sale of goods for cash, credit, and exchange, and produce the same with the last inventory, in case of a loss, may be waived and when an agent who issued a policy was informed, after the contract was made, of the system of bookkeeping used by the insured, which did not include a cash-book, and then stated that the system was all right and would be satisfactory, the insurance company cannot, after a loss, defend on the ground that a cash-book was not kept; the requirement will be deemed to have been waived.

2. INSURANCE POLICY -- Right of Forfeiture Waived by Adjuster. Where the adjuster of a fire-insurance company, after a loss, learns of the non-compliance by the insured with a provision of the policy with regard to keeping books, and, instead of declaring a forfeiture therefor, negotiates with the insured for the making of other and better proofs, extends the time to make proofs, and requires the insured, at some trouble and expense, to submit to an examination under oath concerning the fire and the property destroyed, the company will be deemed to have waived the right of forfeiture.

Barnett & Barnett, and Joe Rolston, for plaintiff in error.

W. W. Brown, and Kellogg & Madden, for defendant in error.

JOHNSTON C. J. All the Justices concurring.

OPINION

JOHNSTON, C. J.:

This was an action brought by Mrs. J. H. Allen against the German Insurance Company, of Freeport, Ill., upon a contract insuring a store-building and a stock of merchandise therein against loss or damage by fire. The policy of insurance was issued on September 7, 1901, and the building and stock of goods were wholly destroyed by fire on September 24, 1901. Payment of the loss was refused by the insurance company because of alleged non-performance of the conditions of the policy by the insured. The contract contained what is commonly spoken of as the "iron-safe clause," by which the insured agreed to keep a set of books showing a record of the business transacted, including all purchases and sales, for credit, cash, and exchange, as well as the last inventory of the stock taken within twelve months prior to the happening of the loss, and to keep books and inventory securely locked in a fire-proof safe at night and when the store was not actually open for business; and, also, the further provision that such books and inventory would be produced in case of any loss, and in the event of a failure to produce the same the policy should be deemed to be null and void. On the part of the company it was contended that the insured had failed to keep the books showing her cash sales, or to produce any such books after the loss occurred. The insured contended that she had substantially performed the conditions and requirements of the policy, and that if she had failed to any extent it had been waived by the company and its agents. Among other questions that of waiver was...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Cohen v. Home Ins., Co.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Delaware
    • 8 March 1918
    ... ... THE HOME INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation of the State of New York, defendant below, defendant ... Robert ... H. Richards and Aaron Finger, also T. Allen Golds-borough, of ... Maryland, for plaintiff in error ... v. Fidelity & Cas. Co., 106 Md. 17, 66 A. 614; ... Goebel v. German-American Ins. Co., 127 Md. 419, 96 ... The ... defendant ... ...
  • Allen v. Phoenix Assurance Co.
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 6 May 1908
    ... ... SANDERS, Under the Firm Name of SANDERS & ALLEN, Respondents, v. PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant Supreme Court of Idaho May 6, 1908 ... FIRE ... PLICATION FOR INSURANCE-KNOWLEDGE OF AGENT-WAIVER ... OF CONDITIONS IN POLICY-CONDITION LIMITING AUTHORITY OF ... Ohio C. C., N. S., 567; Gillum & Co. v. Fire ... Assn., 106 Mo.App. 673, 80 S.W. 283; German Ins. Co ... v. Allen, 69 Kan. 729, 77 P. 529; Meigs v. London ... Assur. Co., 126 F. 781; ... ...
  • Michigan Idaho Lumber Company, a Corp. v. Northern Fire & Marine Insurance Company
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • 21 October 1916
    ... ... F. & M. Ins. Co. 7 S.D. 410, 64 N.W. 206; Weddington ... v. Piedmont F. Ins. Co. 141 N.C. 234, 54 S.E. 271, 8 ... Ann. Cas. 497; German-American Ins. Co. v. Humphrey, ... 62 Ark. 348, 54 Am. St. Rep. 297, 35 S.W. 428; May, Ins. 292; ... Hawkes v. Dodge County Mut. Ins. Co. 11 ... Co. v ... Yeagley, 2 Ann. Cas. 282, note; Sharp v. Scottish ... Union & Nat. Ins. Co. 136 Cal. 542, 69 P. 253, 615; ... Allen v. Phoenix Assur. Co. 14 Idaho 728, 95 P. 829; ... Hulen v. National F. Ins. Co. 80 Kan. 127, 102 P ... 52; Queen Ins. Co. v. Straughan, 70 ... ...
  • Daniel v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 23 February 1931
    ... ... 357 JULIA E. DANIEL, RESPONDENT, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO., APPELLANT Court of Appeals of Missouri, Springfield February 23, ... binding upon the company is valid and binding as to the ... beneficiary. The soliciting agent, ... Grand Lodge, A. O ... U. W., 120 Minn. 36, 138 N.W. 946; German Ins. Co ... v. Allen, 69 Kan. 729, 77 P. 529; Burnham v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT