The Howard Mfg. Co. v. The Water Lot Co.
| Decision Date | 31 January 1875 |
| Citation | The Howard Mfg. Co. v. The Water Lot Co., 53 Ga. 689 (Ga. 1875) |
| Parties | The Howard Manufacturing Company et al., plaintiffs in error. v. The Water Lot Company, defendant in error. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Covenants. Land. Title. Equity. Exhibits. Before Judge James Johnson. Muscogee Superior Court. November Term, 1874.
For the facts, see the decision.
R. J. Moses; BeandfoRd & Garraed, for plaintiffs in error.
H. L. Benning, for defendant.
It appears from the record in this case that on the 13th December, 1859, Van Leonard, trustee of the Howard Manufacturing *Company, recovered a judgment in the superior court of Muscogee county v. the Water Lot Company, for breach of covenant—damages, $3,033 00 and costs. An execution was issued on this judgment on 18th September, 1867, and the present bill was filed to enjoin its collection on 21st December, 1868.
On the 23d June, 1873, Jesse J. Bradford, trustee, was made a party in place of Van Leonard, trustee, deceased.
On the 21st May, 1871, defendant filed a demurrer, and on the same day filed a plea setting forth that the suit on which said judgment was founded had been transferred by the Howard Manufacturing Company to R. J. Moses, for the benefit of divers judgment creditors of said company, amounting to $11,000 00, and that the proceeds collected upon said judgment were to be paid pro rata to said creditors, less one-fourth the amount of the same, which was to be retained by him for his fees. This assignment was made in 1854. The court overruled this plea, but directed that R. J. Moses should be made a party, which was done, and the bill amended June 23d, 1873.
At the November term, 1874, defendant moved to dismiss the bill for want of equity and on the special ground of demurrer filed at May term, 1871.
The court overruled the demurrer on both grounds, and this is assigned for error.
The following are the grounds of equity set forth in the bill: That the Water Lot Company, July 9th, 1847, conveyed by deed to Van Leonard, as trustee of the Howard Manufacturing Company, water lot eleven, containing the following covenants—the deed is set forth, and after conveying the property for $5,000 00, contains this clause:
There are further covenants not to allow any buildings erected than such Van Leonard is permitted to erect.
The habendum is to Van Leonard, in trust for the stockholders of the Howard Manufacturing Company, their heirs and assigns, forever.
The deed is signed:
*The bill further...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Lingle Water Users' Assn. v. Occidental Building & Loan Assn
...of a covenant affirmative as well as negative, may run with the land, no less than the benefits, (15 C. J. 1249; note, 41 A. L. R. 1364; 51 A. L. R. 1326) and that they will enforced in equity even though not strictly running with the land, as held and discussed by Pomeroy on Equity, (4th E......
-
Muscogee Mfg. Co. v. Eagle & Phenix Mills
...to keep the same and said dam in good repair." This contained a covenant running with the land. Howard Manufacturing Co. v. Water Lot Co., 53 Ga. 689; Colquitt v. Howard, 11 Ga. 568. As to the distinction between a personal covenant and one running with the land, see Spencer's Case, 5 Coke,......
-
Muscogee Mfg. Co v. Mills
...to keep the same and said dam in good repair." This contained a covenant running with the land. Howard Manufacturing Co. v. Water Lot Co., 53 Ga. 689; Colquitt v. Howard, 11 Ga. 568. As to the distinction between a personal covenant and one running with the land, see Spencer's Case, 5 Coke,......
-
Lyons v. Planters' Loan & Sav. Bank
... ... Redwyne, 16 Ga. 67; Miller v. Saunders, 18 Ga ... 492; Behn v. Young, 21 Ga. 207; Howard ... Manuf'g Co. v. Water-Lot Coo., 39 Ga. 574, 53 Ga ... 689; Patterson v. Turner, 62 Ga. 674; ... ...