The Hugo
Decision Date | 08 July 1893 |
Citation | 57 F. 403 |
Parties | THE HUGO. v. COMPANIA NAVIGACION LA FLECHA. [1] BRAUER et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
McFarland & Parkin, for libelants.
Butler Stillman & Hubbard and Mr. Mynderse, for respondents.
The above libel was filed to recover damages for the loss of 129 cattle, out of a shipment of 165, upon a voyage of the steamer Hugo from New York to Liverpool in October and November, 1891. The steamer sailed from this port on the 24th of October. During three days from October 30th to November 1st inclusive, the vessel met heavy weather during which there was heavy rolling of the vessel. The cattle were in pens on deck; a few were forward under or near the turtle back, which were saved; the rest were in the vicinity of Nos 3 and 4 hatches forward and aft of the engine room in pens built in the wings on the port and starboard sides of the ship, all of which were lost.
The storm was heaviest on the afternoon and night of Saturday the 31st, the wind and seas coming first, and heaviest, from the northwest, but on Saturday hauling to the northward and to east northeast, with cross seas. Some slight damage was done to a few pens on the 30th; more were broken on Saturday the 31st; but these were repaired, and the cattle put in place toward nightfall. About 5 o'clock on that day the after gangways were opened on each side, and about 10 or 12 cattle that had become maimed and helpless were sent overboard through those gangways. The chief loss was during that night and the following morning when shortly after daylight, the captain gave orders to open the forward gangways also, and the whole deck was cleared of all the cattle, save the 39 under the turtle back. The following is a translation of the account given in the ship's log, the master and most of the crew being Spanish:
The testimony of the master and of the first officer and the boatswain accords in the main with the statements of the log in regard to the handling of the cattle and the force of the storm.
There were six cattlemen provided by the shippers for the care of the cattle. Several were inefficient. The testimony of Joyce the foreman, and of Edwards, apparently an efficient man, is to the effect that the violence of the storm was very much exaggerated; that they had been many years making voyages in charge of cattle; that they had been through much heavier weather; and that the sacrifice of the cattle on the afternoon of Saturday and the morning of Sunday was without reason or necessity. In the great contradiction between these witnesses and the ship's witnesses as to the force and effect of the storm, I have come to the conclusion that there is little candor on either side. The fact that aside from some of the pens, and except the cattle which the men forced overboard, nothing of any account belonging to the ship herself was carried away, is conclusive to my mind that the ship was in no peril, and that there was no such actual hurricane, or any such extraordinary storm as the language of the log or the testimony of the officers would indicate. It is manifest that Joyce and Edwards, who were persons of much experience in transporting cattle, were greatly incensed at the sacrifice of the cattle and the brutal...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smead v. Chandler
...14 Bush, 214; 33 S.W. 11, 484; 22 P. 517; 13 N.J.L. 326; 31 Ib. 90; 45 Mo. 474; 35 Ga. 176; 56 N.E. 773; 58 F. 799; 56 F. 602; 50 F. 561; 57 F. 403; 29 F. 82 F. 471; 94 F. 885; 56 F. 124; 111 F. 415; 70 N.W. 508; 129 U.S. 397; 125 Mass. 374; 112 N.C. 188; 124 Mo. 178; 149 A. 544; N. E. 998;......
-
Dietrich v. United States Shipping Board EF Corp., 164.
... ... The Hadji (C. C.) 20 F. 875; The Montana (C. C.) 22 F. 715, 22 Blatchf. 372; The Hugo (D. C.) 57 F. 403, modified on other grounds in (D. C.) 61 F. 860; The Orcadian (D. C.) 116 F. 930; The Good Hope (D. C.) 190 F. 597. And this principle is now established by statute. The Harter Act, being Act Feb. 13, 1893, c. 105, §§ 1, 2, 27 Stat. 445 (Comp. St. §§ 8029, 8030), expressly ... ...
-
The New England
... ... the Second circuit. A like provision inserted in a ... passenger's ticket between Belgium and New York, the ... steamer being American, was held void by the same court in ... The Kensington, 36 C.C.A. 533, 94 F. 885. See, also, The ... Energia (D.C.) 56 F. 602; The Hugo (D.C.) 57 F. 403; The ... Glenmavis (D.C.) 69 F. 472. The authority of these cases ... outweighs that of The Oranmore (D.C.) 24 F. 922, which was ... affirmed in the circuit court, without any statement of ... reasons, by Judge Bond. 92 F. 396. The opinion of Judge ... Morris in the ... ...
-
Botany Worsted Mills v. Knott
... ... the Harter act. ' In the case of The Glenmavis, 69 F ... 472, 476, the same conclusion was reached by Judge Butler on ... full consideration; and I have nothing further to add to what ... has already been said in this Court in previous cases. The ... Brantford City, 29 F. 373, 396; The Hugo, 57 F. 403-411; The ... Etona, 64 F. 880; The Guildhall, 58 F. 796; The Energia, 56 ... F. 124, 127, affirmed 13 C.C.A. 653, 66 F. 604. See The Iowa, ... 50 F. 561 ... Decree ... for the libelant, with reference to compute the ... ...