The Iowa
Decision Date | 26 May 1892 |
Citation | 50 F. 561 |
Parties | THE IOWA. v. THE IOWA. MONROE |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts |
Proctor & Tappan and Payson E. Tucker, for libelant.
J. D Ball, for claimant.
This is a libel in admiralty filed by Albert N. Monroe, an exporter of cattle, against the British steamship Iowa, of the Warren line of transatlantic steamers, to recover for damage to cattle on a voyage from Boston to Liverpool. The cattle were shipped under a special contract in writing between the steamship company and one Hathaway, made in Boston, and assigned in part by Hathaway to Monroe, the provisions of which were expressly assented to by Monroe by a memorandum indorsed on the instrument signed by his agent. The material clauses in the contract relative to the questions now before the court are the following:
'Ship to furnish fittings.' ''All questions arising on this contract shall be decided according to British law.'
The contract also prescribed a form of bill of lading to be issued for the cattle, containing similar exemptions from liability on account of the fittings. The steamship sailed from Boston on the afternoon of Tuesday April 12, 1887, having on board in all 347 head of cattle 232 of which were the property of the libelant, and 115 belonged to Hathaway. Of the libelant's cattle, 164 were stowed on the forward main deck. The test of his cattle, and all of Hathaway's, were stowed on the spar deck. The cattle on the main deck were confined in pens on each side of a passageway running fore and aft, each pen holding four animals, with cleats nailed to the deck to prevent their slipping.
On Wednesday morning the ship encountered a gale from N.E., with a beam sea on the port side, which caused the ship to lurch heavily to starboard. A part of the cargo was grain in bulk and during the gale this appears to have shifted to starboard, causing a considerable list on that side, and increasing the lurching. The consequence was that some of the pens on the starboard side of the main deck gave way, the stanchions and head boards...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smead v. Chandler
...N.J.L. 23; 14 Bush, 214; 33 S.W. 11, 484; 22 P. 517; 13 N.J.L. 326; 31 Ib. 90; 45 Mo. 474; 35 Ga. 176; 56 N.E. 773; 58 F. 799; 56 F. 602; 50 F. 561; 57 F. 403; 29 F. 82 F. 471; 94 F. 885; 56 F. 124; 111 F. 415; 70 N.W. 508; 129 U.S. 397; 125 Mass. 374; 112 N.C. 188; 124 Mo. 178; 149 A. 544;......
-
Botany Worsted Mills v. Knott
... ... has already been said in this Court in previous cases. The ... Brantford City, 29 F. 373, 396; The Hugo, 57 F. 403-411; The ... Etona, 64 F. 880; The Guildhall, 58 F. 796; The Energia, 56 ... F. 124, 127, affirmed 13 C.C.A. 653, 66 F. 604. See The Iowa, ... 50 F. 561 ... Decree ... for the libelant, with reference to compute the ... ...
-
Dolan v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n
... ... is at least doubtful whether they can be permitted to nullify ... those laws, in their application to their contract, by a ... stipulation that the contract shall be governed by the laws ... of another state. See The Brantford City, 29 F. 373-396; The ... Iowa, 50 F. 561; The Hugo, 57 F. 403-411. However that may ... be, St.1894, c. 522, § 73, prohibits insurance companies ... contracting insurance under this act from issuing "any ... policy to a resident of this commonwealth which does not bear ... in bold letters upon its face a plain description ... ...
-
Wright v. Southern Pacific Company and Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company
...v. Railroad, 62 Mo.App. 461; Blanchard v. Railroad, 60 Mo.App. 267; Potts v. Railroad, 17 Mo.App. 394; The Guildhall, 58 F. 796; The Iowa, 50 F. 561; Willock v. Railroad, 166 Pa. 184, 27 L. R. A. (2) A carrier is by law bound to carry without any limitation of common law liability, and a st......