The Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company v. Lucas
| Decision Date | 06 October 1897 |
| Docket Number | 2,227 |
| Citation | 47 N.E. 842,18 Ind.App. 239 |
| Parties | THE LAKE ERIE AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. LUCAS |
| Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
From the Benton Circuit.
Reversed.
W. E. Hackedorn, John B. Cockrum, Stuart Brothers & Hammond and E. Grant Hall, for appellant.
Will R. Wood, Charles Thompson and Fraser & Isham, for appellee.
BLACK, J. WILEY, C. J., did not take part in this decision.
The appellee recovered judgment against the appellant for expulsion from the appellant's train of cars, upon which the appellee had entered as a passenger. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled. In the complaint it is shown that the appellee tendered the conductor the regular cash fare from LaFayette, where she entered the car, to Tipton, a station on appellant's railway to which the train was run, but the conductor refused to accept the amount so tendered and demanded fifty cents more, and threatened to stop the train and eject the appellee therefrom, whereupon she tendered the regular cash fare from LaFayette to Dayton, the next station on appellants road, but the conductor refused to accept, and stopped the train and ejected the appellee. It is not shown that the regulations of the appellant provided for the discharge of passengers from the train on which appellee was riding either at Tipton or at Dayton.
No presumption can be indulged against the defend-and in such case, but the wrong of defendant must be affirmatively shown.
It does not appear from the complaint that the expulsion was wrongful, and it is not shown that the appellant employed excessive force in ejecting the appellee. Chicago, etc., R. R. Co. v. Bills, 104 Ind. 13, 3 N.E. 611; White v. Evansville, etc., R. R. Co., 133 Ind. 480, 33 N.E. 273 Pittsburgh, etc., R. W. Co. v. Lightcap, 7 Ind.App. 249, 34 N.E. 243.
The complaint was insufficient.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded, with instruction to sustain the demurrer to the complaint.
WILEY, C. J., did not take part in this decision.
To continue reading
Request your trial