The Lancashire Insurance Co. v. Boardman
Decision Date | 05 June 1897 |
Docket Number | 10054 |
Citation | 49 P. 92,58 Kan. 339 |
Parties | THE LANCASHIRE INSURANCE CO. v. W. F. BOARDMAN |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Decided January, 1897.
Error from Sedgwick District Court. Hon. C. Reed, Judge.
Judgment affirmed.
Thomas C. Wilson, for plaintiff in error. Myron H. Beach, of counsel.
Holmes & Haymaker, for defendant in error.
Boardman brought suit on a policy of insurance for twenty-five hundred dollars, issued by the plaintiff in error to Flora Cowley on the fifth day of December, 1889, alleging in his petition the execution of the policy, payment of the premium, and the destruction by fire of the property insured. It was also alleged that the Sedgwick Loan and Investment Company loaned Flora Cowley the sum of twenty-five hundred dollars, for which she executed her bond secured by mortgage covering the property insured; that, as additional security for the loan, the said Flora Cowley, with the consent of the duly authorized agent of the defendant, assigned the policy of insurance to the Sedgwick Loan and Investment Company that said investment company duly assigned to the plaintiff the mortgage and the debt secured thereby, and that the defendant's agent attached to the policy what is denominated as a mortgage clause, which bears date the day on which the policy was issued and the essential parts of which read as follows:
For a seventh defense, the defendant set up in its answer:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Greenwich Bank v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford
...10 S. Ct. 1019, 34 L. Ed. 408;Southern Pants Co. v. Rochester German Ins. Co., 159 N. C. 78, 74 S. E. 812;Lancashire Ins. Co. v. Boardman, 58 Kan. 339, 49 P. 92,62 Am. St. Rep. 621. Some of these cases have held that the possession was not that of the receiver but the possession of the cour......
-
Parker v. Iowa Mut. Tornado Ins. Ass'n
... ... a law action commenced by the receiver of the insured on a ... wind and tornado insurance policy. The action was tried to ... the court without a jury, and judgment rendered in favor of ... Ins. Co. v. Bartlett, 91 Va. 305, 21 S.E. 476, 50 ... Am.St.Rep. 832; Lancashire Ins. Co. v. Boardman, 58 ... Kan. 339, 49 P. 92, 62 Am.St.Rep. 621 ... In 2 ... ...
-
Bowling v. Continental Ins. Co.
... ... declaration in an action to recover the amount of an ... insurance policy follows the form prescribed therefor by ... statute, the policy, if filed therewith, ... v. Rochester ... German Ins. Co., 159 N.C. 78, 74 S.E. 812, and ... Lancashire Ins. Co ... [103 S.E. 287] ... v. Boardman, 58 Kan. 339, 49 P. 92, 62 Am.St.Rep. 621. click ... ...
-
Mack v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co.
...Oakland Home Ins. Co. v. Bank of Commerce, 47 Neb. 717, 66 N. W. 646,36 L. R. A. 673, 58 Am. St. Rep. 663;Lancashire Ins. Co. v. Boardman, 58 Kan. 339, 49 P. 92,62 Am. St. Rep. 621; and Findlay v. Union Mutual Fire Ins. Co., supra. None of these authorities is in point, for under the polici......