The Lepanto
Decision Date | 23 August 1884 |
Citation | 21 F. 651 |
Parties | THE LEPANTO. v. THE LEPANTO and another. NEDERLANDSCH AMERICAANSCHE STOOMVART MAATSCHAPPY |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
The libel in this case was filed by the owners of the Dutch steam-ship Edam, against the British steam-ship Lepanto, in rem, and against her master, in personam, to recover $450,000, the alleged value of the Edam and her cargo, which were sunk by a collision with the Lepanto during a dense fog off George's bank, at about 10 P.M. on the night of September 21, 1882.
The Edam was an iron steam-ship, and one of the libelants' line of packets engaged in the transportation of freight and passengers between New York and Holland. She was of 2,276 tons register, 320 feet long, 39 feet beam, and 32 feet deep. She left New York, bound for Rotterdam, in the forenoon of September 20th, with a full cargo of merchandise, 54 men officers and crew, and 21 passengers. The Lepanto was an iron steamer carrying freight only. She was of 1,800 tons register, 305 feet long, 36 feet wide, and 26 feet deep, She sailed from Hull, bound for New York, on September 5th, with a medium cargo, and 34 men, officers, and crew. At the time of the collision she was drawing about 20 feet of water, and had about 9 feet free-board.
On the evening of the 21st the wind was light from the S.W., and the sea smooth, with a moderate roll. Each steamer had taken meridian observations at the previous noon, and corrected the ship's clock for local time accordingly. Their difference in longitude was then about 14 minutes of time, which nearly agrees with the difference of their clocks as to the time of the collision. Until the first whistle of the Lepanto was heard, a few minutes preceding the collision, the Edam had been sailing E. 1/2 S. by compass; the Lepanto, due W. by compass. The log of the Edam, which was put in evidence after the principal argument of the cause, was made up on the 24th on the arrival of the Lepanto in New York, and gives the following narrative Signed by * * * . 'J. H. TAAT (captain) and J. A. LAACKROY, (first officer.)
The testimony showed that the first officer was on the bridge in actual charge of the navigation of the Edam. The third officer was also on the bridge, and the captain a part of the time on the bridge and a part of the time on the deck, with another lookout properly stationed, and other seamen also on deck. Their testimony in general sustains the narrative of the log, though with some important differences. The interval between the fist whistle and the collision is estimated by the officers at 2 1/2 to 3 minutes; the lookout estimates it at 6; but no time was taken by the clock. Only two whistles from the Lepanto were heard, estimated to be about two minutes apart. The first officer estimated the time during which the helm was steadied to be about half a minute; and the time from the second order to starboard to the collision about the same. In the libel and in the testimony it is stated, though not stated in the log, that when the first whistle was heard the engines were ordered to 'slow.' No other order to the engineer was given. The lookout testified that the green light was seen and reported by him after the second whistle was heard, in accordance with = the statement of the log. The officers testify that it was reported, and seen by them, as a momentary flash, some five or six seconds after the first whistle was heard, and just after the first order to starboard was given. The green light was not referred to in the original libel, or first amended libel, but is mentioned only in the second amended libel.
The log of the Lepanto is as follows:
* * * .'
This account is confirmed by some five or six of the Lepanto's witnesses. The master, Capt. Rogers, was on the bridge, in charge of the navigation, and the second officer, as lookout, was on the top of the pilot-house, with another lookout forward. The chief engineer, with an assistant, was on duty in the engine-room. The master handled the lanyard of the whistle, and took the times stated from a clock near by. The time of the collision, 10:15, however, was taken, as he testified, not at the moment of collision, but full speed astern to be sufficient to stop all forward motion of the ship when going, as she had been, at the rate of 4 1/2 knots. He further testified that at 9 P.M., under the captain's orders, the steam pressure was reduced from 75 pounds to 60, bringing down her previous full speed of 9 knots to 8 knots per hour; that at 10 P.M. she was put at half speed, making from 4 to 4 1/2 knots per hour.
The Edam's full speed was from 10 1/2 to 11 knots. At 9:30 her steam pressure was ordered to be eased, her revolutions were brought down from 58 to 37 per minute, and her speed reduced to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Villain & Fassio E Compagnia v. Tank Steamer EW Sinclair
...was such that the Court was unwilling to attribute a fault to the IBERIA which would require her to share the damages. In The Lepanto, 21 F. 651, 658 (S.D.N.Y. 1884), the court indicated that the sound heard came from "a precise direction." Moreover, the exoneration from fault for a course ......
-
The Sagamore
... ... though each point stood separate and alone. They must be ... construed in a nautical sense, and understood in a nautical ... sense, and applied as seamen understand and apply them ... Haynes' The Rule of the Road at Sea, p. 1 ... In The ... Lepanto (D.C.) 21 F. 651, it was said by Judge Addison Brown: ... 'No ... steamer's speed can be held 'moderate' that does ... admit of her coming to a full stop within her share of the ... distance that separates her from another, after the ... latter's whistle is audible.' ... In ... ...
-
THE ERNEST H. MEYER
...is herself going at the moderate speed required by law." The Chattahoochee, 173 U.S. 540, 548, 19 S.Ct. 491, 494, 43 L.Ed. 801; The Lepanto (D.C.) 21 F. 651, 659; The Old Colony (D.C.) 52 F.(2d) 992, 993, The length of each steamer was 300 feet, and hence the speed of either was excessive i......
-
THE SILVER PALM
...The Chattahooche, 173 U.S. 540, 548, 19 S. Ct. 491, 43 L.Ed. 801; The Umbria, 166 U. S. 404, 421, 17 S.Ct. 610, 41 L.Ed. 1053; The Lepanto (D.C.) 21 F. 651, 659; The Old Colony (D.C.) 52 F.(2d) 992, 993; The Ernest H. Meyer (C.C.A.9) 84 F.(2d) 496, This principle would require them to proce......