The Lessee of Isaiah Frost and Others, Plaintiffs In Error v. the Frostburg Coal Company
Court | United States Supreme Court |
Citation | 16 L.Ed. 637,24 How. 278,65 U.S. 278 |
Parties | THE LESSEE OF ISAIAH FROST AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE FROSTBURG COAL COMPANY |
Decision Date | 01 December 1860 |
THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Maryland.
The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
It was argued by Mr. Davis and Mr. Shackelford for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. Price and Mr. Pearre for the defendants.
The question being on the construction of a local charter, the arguments are not likely to be of general interest, and are therefore omitted.
Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Maryland.
Page 279
The action in the court below was an ejectment brought by the heirs of Isaiah Frost, to recover the possession of a tract of land situate in the county of Allegany, Maryland. The defence set up was a conveyance of the land by their ancestor to the defendants. The only question in the case is, whether or not the Frostburg Coal Company was capable of taking and holding real estate at the date of the deed, the 13th March, 1845.
The court charged the jury, if they found that Mechack Frost, Isaiah Frost, Thomas J. McKaig, and William W. McKaig, the parties named in the act of incorporation of 1845, accepted the charter, and proceeded to act as a corporate body under it, by the name of the Frostburg Coal Company, opened their coal mines, transported the coal to market, borrowed money on the credit of the company, and made large and costly improvements on the lands in controversy, during all which time Isaiah Frost, the ancestor, acted as one of the directors; and further found, that the said Frost executed and delivered to the company the deed of the 13th March, 1845, given in evidence, they must find a verdict for the defendants.
The act of incorporation, which was passed February 24, 1845, provided that Mechack Frost, Isaiah Frost, Thomas J. McKaig, and William W. McKaig, and such other persons as may be associated with them in the manner afterwards provided, shall be and they are hereby incorporated and made a body politic and corporate, by the name of the Frostburg Coal Company, and by that name shall have succession, &c., conferring the usual corporate powers for the manufacture of iron, and mining of coal, and for transporting the same to market; and among others, the power to purchase and hold all such property, real, personal, and mixed, as the company may require for the purposes aforesaid.
The second section provided, that the capital stock of the company should consist of five thousand shares of one hundred dollars each, of which the lands and mines of Mechack Frost, Isaiah Frost, Thomas J. McKaig, and William W. McKaig, on one part, and those who may associate with them
Page 280
and constitute the aforesaid subscription for stock, payable in money, on the other part.
The third section provided, that the subscriptions to the capital stock should be made at such places, and in such manner, as should be designated by the four persons above named, and that the shareholders of one or more shares of stock should be members of the corporation, and entitled to one vote for each share so held; and making the shares assignable and transferable, as may be provided in the by-laws of the company.
The fourth section provided, that the affairs of the company should be managed by a president and four directors, to be chosen by the stockholders, to serve one year, and till others shall be elected; and until the first election of directors shall be held, the said Mechack Frost, Isaiah Frost, Thomas J. McKaig, and William W. McKaig, shall have full power and authority to exercise all the corporate...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kardo Co. v. Adams
...... corporations, the American Ball Bearing Company, the Packard. Motor Car Company, and the ... made or joined, either as plaintiffs or defendants, for the. purpose of creating a ... . We. think the court was in error in making the inquiry and in. dismissing the ...To. the same effect, Frost v. Coal Co., 24 How. 278, 16. L.Ed. 637. . ... officers and their places were filled by others, who. likewise admit that the same stock was ...Lessee of Frost. v. Frostburg Coal Co., 24 How. 278, ......
-
Postal Tel. Cable Co. of Utah v. Oregon S.L.R. Co.
...65 P. 735 23 Utah 474 POSTAL TEL. CABLE COMPANY OF UTAH, Respondent, v. OREGON S. L. R. ...E. & W. R. Co., 132 Pa. 591, 19 A. 291; Frost v. Coal Co.,. 24 How. 278, 16 L.Ed. 637. . . ...994. . . We find. no error in the record, and the judgment of the lower ......
-
Cluthe v. Evansville, Mt. C.&N. Ry. Co.
...Utah v. Utah, etc., Co. (C. C.) 110 Fed. 879, where the language is very similar to that of the statute before us; Frost v. Frostburg Co., 24 How. 278, 16 L. Ed. 637; Atchafalaya Bank v. Dawson, 13 La. 497; La Grange, etc., Co. v. Rainey, 7 Cold. (Tenn.) 420;Brown v. Wyandotte Co., 68 Ark. ......
-
Cluthe v. Evansville, Mt. Carmel And Northern Railway Co.
......Carmel and Northern Railway Company No. 21,729Supreme Court of IndianaJune 22, 1911 . ... against William B. Cluthe and others. From a judgment for. plaintiff, defendants ... statute before us); Frost's Lessee v. Frostburg Coal Co. (1860), 24 How. ......