The Memphis, Kansas & Colorado Railway Company v. Thompson
Decision Date | 21 September 1880 |
Citation | 24 Kan. 170 |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Parties | THE MEMPHIS, KANSAS & COLORADO RAILWAY COMPANY v. JOHN W. THOMPSON, as Mayor of the City of Parsons, et al |
Decided July, 1880
Original Proceedings in Mandamus.
ON the 7th day of May, 1879, an alternative writ of mandamus was issued out of this court, upon a petition filed therefor on behalf of the Memphis, Kansas & Colorado Railway Company and directed to John W. Thompson, as mayor of the city of Parsons, and A. A. Osgood, as clerk of said city, commanding them, as such officers, immediately upon the receipt of said writ, to issue and deliver to the plaintiff thirty negotiable bonds of said city, each for $ 1,000, payable in thirty years from July 1st, 1878, with interest at the rate of eight per cent. per annum, payable annually, both principal and interest payable at the fiscal agency of the state of Kansas in the city of New York -- such bonds to be in the usual form, with interest coupons attached, and covering the principal sum of $ 30,000, and to be issued in payment of the subscription of said city to a like amount of the capital stock of the railway company aforesaid; or that the said defendants show cause, etc. June 16, 1879, the defendants answered, showing cause. Afterward, the case was tried upon the pleadings and oral and written evidence. The opinion herein was filed September 21, 1880.
Judgment entered in favor of defendant.
Ayres & Kimball, for plaintiff.
David Kelso, R. T. Holloway, and T. C. Cory, for defendants.
OPINION
This action was brought to compel the issue of $ 30,000 in bonds of the city of Parsons, in payment of the subscription of the city to a like amount of the capital stock of the Memphis, Kansas & Colorado Railway Company. The aid was voted and subscription made under ch. 107, Laws of 1876, the provisions of which, so far as material, are as follows:
The plaintiff was incorporated November 26, 1877. On the 14th of December, 1877, a petition was presented to the mayor and council of the city, the terms and conditions of which are embraced in the order hereafter referred to, excepting the second proviso of the petition, which is as follows:
"Provided further, That no such bonds shall be issued until the said . . . railway shall be constructed and in operation from the city of Cherokee . . . to the road-bed of the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway, in the city of Parsons, and its depot established within thirty-five rods of the brick passenger depot of the last-mentioned railway, in said city of Parsons."
On the 19th of December, 1877, after examining the petition and finding it sufficient as to numbers and qualifications of petitioners, etc., the mayor and council made an order calling an election, which, so far as material, is as follows:
etc. [Here follows the order calling a special election for the purpose indicated, and prescribing the form of ballots, etc., duly signed, sealed and attested.]
It will be noticed that the order differs from the petition in this, that instead of leaving the manner of construction and extent of equipment an open question, it distinctly provides how the road shall be constructed and equipped.
Notice of the election was given as prescribed by statute. The election was held January 29, 1878, the day named in the order, and more than two-thirds of the votes polled were in favor of the proposition.
On the first of February, the mayor and council met and canvassed the vote, declared the result as stated, and at the regular session held on the 11th of the same month, passed a resolution reciting the steps that had been taken, etc., and proceeding as follows:
" . . . And whereas, All of said proceedings, including the making of said petition, its presentation, and the order for said election made thereon, notice by publication of said election, the manner in which said election was held, the returns made, and the result ascertained, have been in strict conformity with law: now, therefore, be it
"Resolved, That the city clerk of this city, in the name and in behalf of the city of Parsons, subscribe thirty thousand dollars to the capital stock of the Memphis, Kansas & Colorado railway; such subscription to be made and stock paid for in the manner and subject to the conditions and restrictions set out at large in the body of the proposition submitted at the election aforesaid," etc.
On the 22d day of the same month, the city clerk, in behalf of the city, subscribed upon the books of the railway company for the stock as directed in the resolution. The subscription after...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Breckinridge County v. Beard
... ... Company was the payee in the note and was the authorized ... & C. Ry. Co. v ... Thompson, 24 Kan. 170; Cin., S. & C. R. Co. v ... ...
-
Breckinridge County v. Beard
...embodied in the subscription itself. Ogden v. Kirby, 79 Ill. 555; Burlington & M. River R. Co. v. Boestler, 15 Iowa 555; M.K. & C. Ry. Co. v. Thompson, 24 Kan. 170; Cin., S. & C.R. Co. v. Bensley (C.C.A.) 51 F. 738, 19 L.R.A. 796. It is said that this action was predicated upon promissory n......
-
Ironton Land Company v. Butchart
... ... Co. v. Prince, supra; ... Cargill v. Thompson, 57 Minn. 534; Blagen v ... Thompson, 23 Ore. 239; ... 15, 1894. Cincinnati v. Bensley, supra; Memphis v ... Thompson, 24 Kan. 170; Elliott v. Caldwell, 43 ... farm abutting on a railway right of way is diminished by the ... failure of the ... ...
-
Green County v. Shortell
...would be to give no effect to the natural meaning of the language used. People's Ferry Co. v. Balch, 74 Mass. 303; Memphis, etc., Railway v. Thompson, 24 Kan. 170. fact that the county paid the interest on the bonds for a few years does not estop it to show their invalidity. Marsh v. Fulton......