The Mississippi Bar v. Inserra, 2005-BD-01967-SCT.
| Decision Date | 22 February 2006 |
| Docket Number | No. 2005-BD-01967-SCT.,2005-BD-01967-SCT. |
| Citation | The Mississippi Bar v. Inserra, 929 So.2d 884 (Miss. 2006) |
| Parties | THE MISSISSIPPI BAR, Appellant v. Daniel L. INSERRA, Appellee. |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
¶ 1. This matter came before the Court sitting en banc on The Mississippi Bar's formal complaint against attorney Daniel L. Inserra.
¶ 2. Inserra is a resident of Arizona whose last known address is 8930 East Raintree Drive, Suite 100, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260-7029. Inserra is currently administratively suspended in Mississippi for non-payment of dues pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 73-3-127 (2004). This Court previously imposed a public reprimand against Inserra as a reciprocal sanction pursuant to Rule 13 of the Mississippi Rules of Discipline for his two-year probation imposed by the Supreme Court of Arizona. See The Mississippi Bar v. Inserra, 855 So.2d 447, 451 (Miss.2003).1 While Inserra is not a member of the Bar in good standing, he is subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of this Court.
¶ 3. On or about August 23, 2005, the Supreme Court of Arizona issued a Judgment and Order censuring Inserra and placing him on probation for a period of one year.2 In re Member of State Bar of Arizona, Inserra, No. SB-05-0124-D (Ariz. August 23, 2005). The court concluded that Inserra had violated his duties and obligations as a lawyer.
¶ 4. As a result of his discipline in Arizona, the Bar initiated disciplinary proceedings against Inserra under Rule 13 of the Mississippi Rules of Discipline on October 18, 2005. A Summons and a copy of the formal complaint was mailed by the Bar to Inserra on October 18, 2005. The documents were mailed certified, return receipt requested to Inserra at 8930 East Raintree Drive, Suite 100, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260.
¶ 5. Inserra signed for the envelope on October 21, 2005. Inserra did not respond to the complaint, nor has Inserra filed any answer to the complaint. The court file also contains a proof of personal service of summons on Daniel Inserra c/o Larry Houchins, Executive Director of the Mississippi Bar, pursuant to Miss. R. Discipline 16(a).
¶ 6. The Bar further seeks to have Inserra disciplined in the State of Mississippi by a reciprocal sanction pursuant to Rule 13 of the Mississippi Rules of Discipline. The Bar's request is based on the Judgment and Order of the Supreme Court of Arizona censuring Inserra and placing him on one-year probation. The Bar seeks to recover its costs and expenses occasioned by the filing of this formal complaint against Inserra.
¶ 7. Having carefully and fully considered the Bar's complaint, the Court accepts, pursuant to Miss. R. Discipline 13, the disciplinary action of the Supreme Court of Arizona as conclusive proof of his disciplinary violation. Reciprocal sanctions are warranted; and we impose a public reprimand against Inserra. See Miss. R. Discipline 8(b)(ii).
¶ 8. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that, effective upon entry of this order and based on Rule 13 of the Mississippi Rules of Discipline, a public reprimand shall be enforced in the event Inserra ever seeks reinstatement to The Mississippi Bar under Miss.Code Ann. § 73-3-127 by curing his enrollment fee obligations. The Bar is entitled to recover from Inserra all costs of this disciplinary proceeding, as well as all previously assessed sums. The Bar shall file its Motion for Costs and Expenses with the Court within ten days of the filing of this Order.
¶ 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send, via certified mail, copies of this Order to Daniel L....
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Miss. Bar v. Beal
...KING AND COLEMAN, JJ., CONCUR.1 See Miss.Code Ann. § 73–3–127 (Rev.2012). This Court has disciplinary jurisdiction of Beal. Miss. Bar v. Inserra, 929 So.2d 884 (Miss.2006) (“While Inserra is not a member of the Bar in good standing, he is subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of this Cou......
-
Miss. Bar v. Clegg
...retains disciplinary jurisdiction over him nonetheless. See Miss. Bar v. Beal , 167 So.3d 180, 182 n.1 (Miss. 2014) ; Miss. Bar v. Inserra , 929 So.2d 884 (Miss. 2006). ¶ 6. Rule 13 of the Mississippi Rules of Discipline authorizes this Court to impose reciprocal discipline on a Mississippi......
-
The Miss. BAR v. INSERRA
...by the Arizona Supreme Court. Inserra also has been disciplined by this Court on two separate occasions. See Mississippi Bar v. Inserra, 929 So.2d 884 (Miss.2006) (imposing public reprimand after finding Inserra failed to keep client informed and obtain client's consent), and Mississippi Ba......
-
Mississippi Bar v. Broome, 2006-BD-01081-SCT.
...imposed which may be less or more severe that the discipline imposed by the other jurisdiction. See M.R.D. 13; see also Miss. Bar v. Inserra, 929 So.2d 884 (Miss.2006); Miss. Bar v. Catron, 918 So.2d 1267, 1268 ¶ 9. The Florida Supreme Court imposed a one-year suspension from the practice o......