The Nuska, 1447.
| Decision Date | 28 June 1924 |
| Docket Number | 1447. |
| Citation | 300 F. 231 |
| Parties | THE NUSKA. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida |
Martin H. Long, of Jacksonville, Fla., for libelant and cross-respondent.
John E & Julian Hartridge, of Jacksonville, Fla., for claimant and cross-libelant.
This cause comes on for hearing upon the cross-respondent's motion to dismiss the cross-libel, and its exceptions to the third and fourth articles of said cross-libel.
The libelant filed its libel, alleging the sale to claimant of one 60 H.P. type 'C O' marine engine, with torch ignition, reverse gear, and coupling for propeller shaft plunger circulating pump attached, air compressor attached air tank and connections for starting; same to be furnished f.o.b. cars, Jacksonville, Fla., and shipped to R. R. Ricou & Son Company, Key West, Fla., for $4,720.50, to be paid on receipt of engine. The written contract attached to the libel, and admitted to have been the contract of purchase in the amended answer of respondent, contains this guaranty:
The libel seeks recovery of the contract price of the engine and in addition the price of a compressor, rubber belt, a propeller, trust collar, and set of brushes for generator and in addition to these for labor for installing the engine in the boat. After answering the libel, the respondents filed a cross-libel, in the third article of which they, after admitting making the contract pleaded in the libel, deny that libelant carried out the contract, and allege that libelant agreed to install the engine at Key West in the boat Nuska, to furnish a man to run the engine until it was entirely satisfactory and accepted by claimant, and to furnish a bronze shaft and propeller, which libelant failed to do; that upon failure of libelant to furnish a bronze propeller shaft, respondent was compelled to buy an iron shaft...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Harnischfeger Sales Corporation v. Sternberg Dredging Co
......Peerless Motor Co., 255. Mich. 47, 237 N.W. 41; Barnsdall Refining Corp. v. Birnamwood Oil Co. (7 C. C. A.), 92 F.2d 817; The Nuska,. 300 F. 231, 11 F.2d 103; Bowser v. Birmingham, 276. Mass. 289, 177 N.E. 268, 270; Barnebey v. Collier (8 C. C. A.), 65 F.2d 864, 866; ......
-
International Harvester Co. of America v. Leifer, 1646
...... 175 P. 208; Advance-Rumley Thresher Co. v. Nelson,. (Kan.) 184 P. 982; Williams v. Tractor Co.,. (Calif.) 198 P. 780; The Nuska, 300 F. 231;. Grossellilli Chem. Co. v. Ice Co., (Ala.) 75 So. 920; Murphy v. Gifford, (Mich.) 200 N.W. 263;. Kophal v. Weisenbarger, (Mich.) 158 ......
-
Ford Motor Co. v. Cullum, 8342.
......790, 59 A. L.R. 1164 and Annotations; 55 C.J. 722, 731; Century Electric Co. v. Detroit Copper & Brass Rolling Mills, 8 Cir., 264 F. 49; The Nuska, D.C., 300 F. 231. An implied warranty of fitness as a demonstrator is clearly excluded by the terms of this contract of sale, even ......
-
Tharp v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co.
......***” See also Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. Mahon et al., 13 N.D. 516, 101 N.W. 903; The Nuska, D.C., 300 F. 231, affirmed R. R. Ricou & Sons v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., 5 Cir., 11 F.2d 103; Wall v. Britton Stevens Motor Co., 251 Mass. 517, 146 ......