The Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Kilgore

CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtWoodward
CitationThe Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Kilgore, 32 Pa. 292, 72 Am.Dec. 787 (Pa. 1858)
Decision Date01 January 1858
PartiesThe Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Kilgore.

Stokes, for the plaintiffs in error.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WOODWARD, J.

After an attentive consideration of the ingenious criticism to which the charge of the learned judge has been subjected in the hands of counsel, we have come to the conclusion that it was only too favourable to the plaintiffs in error.

Whilst there is no doubt about the doctrine of concurrent negligence which the learned counsel invokes, the circumstances of this case scarcely admit of its application. The company, as public transporters, took the plaintiff and her three children aboard of their cars at Pittsburgh, under a contract to set them down safely at Greensburg. That it was their duty to stop long enough to let these passengers off at the point of destination is not denied, and that they failed in performing this duty is established by the verdict.

The court is complained of for putting it to the jury to say whether the stop was sufficiently long to permit the plaintiff and her children, "together with all the other passengers, to leave the cars with reasonable convenience and safety." The expression all the other passengers is to be understood, as the jury doubtless understood it, as referring to those who were to alight at Greensburg; and, so limited, it was the very form the question ought to have assumed, for she was to get off in the midst of all others who were to get off at that place, and no consideration of her case could be fair that would lose sight of this fact.

It is an established fact, then, that the company did not give her, in the actual circumstances in which she was placed, reasonable time...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
23 cases
  • Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Tietken
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • September 16, 1896
    ...68 N.W. 336 49 Neb. 130 MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. JOHN F. TIETKEN No. 6714Supreme Court of NebraskaSeptember 16, 1896 ... Haldan v. Great Western R. Co. 30 U. C. C. P. 89; ... Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Henderson, 43 Pa. 449; ... Southern R. Co. v. Kendrick, 40 ... culpable negligence on the part of a railroad company for its ... officers to induce a passenger to leave or board a ... Co. v ... Maugans, 61 Md. 53; Pennsylvania R. Co. v ... Kilgore, 32 Pa. 292; Swigert v. Hannibal & St. J. R ... Co. 75 Mo. 475; Doss v ... ...
  • Duty v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • November 28, 1911
    ... ... railroad company to start a train while passengers are ... obviously in the act of ... 645, 5 Am.St.Rep. 708; Pa ... R. R. Co. v. Kilgore, 32 Pa. 292, 72 Am.Dec. 787, and ... Shealey v. S. C. & G. Ry. Co., 67 ... ...
  • Piper v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • January 16, 1893
    ... ... by defendant, the Minneapolis Street Railway Company, from an ... order of the District Court of Hennepin County, Canty, J., ... Dakota Central Ry ... Co., 43 Minn. 300; Meier v. Pennsylvania R ... Co., 64 Pa. 225; Louisville City Ry. v. Weams, 80 Ky ... R. Co. v. Duncan, 28 ... Ind. 441; Philadelphia Ry. Co. v. Kilgore, 32 Pa ... 292; Cumberland Val. R. Co. v. Maugans, 61 Md. 61; ... ...
  • Kaylor v. Cornwall R. Co.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • November 2, 1906
    ...65 A. 65 216 Pa. 134 Kaylor v. Cornwall Railroad Company, Appellant No. 222Supreme Court of PennsylvaniaNovember 2, 1906 ... Pittsburg Waste Co., 204 Pa. 618; Penna. R.R. Co. v ... Kilgore, 32 Pa. 292; Penna. Canal Company v ... Bentley, 66 Pa. 30; Mallory v ... ...
  • Get Started for Free