The People's National Bank of Princeton v. State ex rel. Emerson
Decision Date | 29 October 1902 |
Docket Number | 19,796 |
Citation | 65 N.E. 6,159 Ind. 353 |
Parties | The People's National Bank of Princeton v. State, ex rel. Emerson et al |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
From Vanderburgh Superior Court; G. A. Cunningham, Special Judge.
Mandamus by the State on the relation of Alexander Emerson and another to compel an inspection of bank books for the purpose of taxing deposits.From a decree for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.
Reversed.
J. H Miller and J. E. McCullough, for appellant.
This is a proceeding by the appellees, who were, respectively, the assessor and the auditor of Gibson county, for a writ of mandamus to compel the appellant to grant to them an inspection of its books showing the names of its depositors, and the amounts to their credit on April 1, 1899.The action was brought in the Gibson Circuit Court in September, 1899, and a change of venue was taken to the superior court of Vanderburgh county.An alternative writ was issued, to which the appellant made its return in nine paragraphs; the first being a general denial, and the others setting up special matters of defense.Demurrers to all of the special answers were sustained.The cause was tried upon the issue made by the general denial, and judgment directing the issuing of a peremptory writ of mandate was rendered.
The defendant below appealed, and filed its transcript in this court on the 6th day of March, 1902.Nine errors were properly assigned.On June 2, 1902, printed briefs for the appellant were filed, in which the supposed errors of the trial court were fully discussed.Two...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Stuck v. Town of Beech Grove
...C. J., absent. * Superseded by opinion, 166 N. E. 153. 1Berkshire v. Caley (1901) 157 Ind. 1, 60 N. E. 696;People's Nat. Bank v. State ex rel. Emerson (1902) 159 Ind. 353, 65 N. E. 6;Union Trac. Co. v. Forst (1904) 162 Ind. 567, 70 N. E. 979;Moore v. Zumbrum (1904) 162 Ind. 696, 70 N. E. 80......
-
Brier v. Mankey
...authorized to reverse the judgment “without prejudice to either party.” Miller v. Julian, 163 Ind. 582, 72 N. E. 588;People's Nat. Bank v. State, 159 Ind. 353, 65 N. E. 6. Assuming that appellee acted in good faith in briefing the case upon the theory of a joint exception, and to reverse a ......
-
Brier v. Mankey
... ... 251, 85 ... N.E. 490; Johnson County Sav. Bank v ... Kramer (1908), 42 Ind.App. 548, 86 N.E ... 10] Nat. Bank v ... State, ex rel. (1902), 159 Ind. 353, 65 ... N.E. 6 ... ...
-
Bryant v. Sch. Town of Oakland City
...is contrary to law, and the same is reversed. 1Berkshire v. Caley (1901) 157 Ind. 1, 60 N. E. 696;People's Nat. Bank v. State ex rel. Emerson (1902) 159 Ind. 353, 65 N. E. 6;Union Trac. Co. v. Forst (1904) 162 Ind. 567, 70 N. E. 979;Moore v. Zumbrum (1904) 162 Ind. 696, 70 N. E. 800;Miller ......