The President, Directors and Company of the Miners Bank of Dubuque, Plaintiffs In Error v. the State of Iowa, On the Relation of the District Prosecuting Attorney

Decision Date01 December 1851
Citation12 How. 1,13 L.Ed. 867,53 U.S. 1
PartiesTHE PRESIDENT, DIRECTORS, AND COMPANY OF THE MINERS' BANK OF DUBUQUE, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE STATE OF IOWA, ON THE RELATION OF THE DISTRICT PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

To continue reading

Request your trial
31 cases
  • Samuel Downes v. George Bidwell
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • May 27, 1901
    ...in which that term is used in the Constitution.' In Scott v. Jones, 5 How. 343, 12 L. ed. 181, and in Miners' Bank v. Iowa ex rel. District Prosecuting Attorney, 12 How. 1, 13 L. ed. 867, it was held that under the judiciary act, permitting writs of error to the supreme court of a state in ......
  • John King Mfg Co v. City Council of August, 392
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • May 14, 1928
    ...statutes 'of a state' within the meaning of section 25 of the Judiciary Act, although that body later became a state. In Miners' Bank v. Iowa, 12 How. 1, 13 L. Ed. 867, a territorial statute was held not to be a statute 'of a state' within section 25, though the territory had since become a......
  • Baldwin v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New York
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • August 5, 1936
    ...involved here. This point is refuted by Springer v. Philippine Islands, 277 U.S. 189, 209, 48 S.Ct. 480, 72 L.Ed. 845; Miners' Bank v. Iowa, 12 How. 1, 13 L.Ed. 867; United States v. Bull, 15 Philippine R. The conclusions reached above make unnecessary any decision on the sovereign immunity......
  • N. Pac. R. Co. v. Barnes
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • January 21, 1892
    ...choose to annul any act, then such act became valid and binding, and was, to all intents and purposes, the act of congress itself. Dubuque v. Iowa, 12 How. 1;Bank v. Yankton, 101 U. S. 129. By appellant's charter, the right of way of the railroad was exempted from taxation within the territ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT