The Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Curtis
Decision Date | 01 August 2022 |
Docket Number | 6:21-CV-701 |
Parties | THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GERALD L. CURTIS, RYAN CURTIS, CHRISTIAN METZGER, Z.R., JOSHUA LAWLER, KAELA HOSTETLER, S.L., and THE ESTATE OF ANTONIO M. CURTIS, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of New York |
ORDER ON STIPULATION
On June 15, 2021, plaintiff Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”), an insurer that provided life insurance coverage to decedent Antonio M. Curtis (the “Insured”) while he was a servicemember, filed this interpleader[1] action against the Estate of Antonio M Curtis, decedent's uncle Gerald L. Curtis, and decedent's six surviving siblings Ryan Curtis, Christian Metzger, Joshua Lawler, Kaela Hostetler, Z.R., and S.L.
On January 11, 2022, the parties jointly moved for three distinct forms of relief: (1) an Order appointing attorney representatives for the two minor defendants; (2) an Order dismissing the unopened Estate of Antonio M. Curtis from this action; (3) an Order granting interpleader relief to Prudential.[2] Dkt. No. 54.
On February 10, 2022, U.S. Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric held an initial conference with the parties. Text Minute Entry for 2/10/22. There, Judge Lovric (1) granted the parties' request to appoint counsel for the minor defendants, (2) denied the parties' request for leave to dismiss the unopened Estate, and (3) held in abeyance Prudential's request for interpleader relief pending the appearance of the guardians ad litem. Id.; see also Dkt. No. 61.
On May 12, 2022, Judge Lovric held a conference in which all the parties and their representatives were present. See Text Minute Entry for 5/12/22. There, Judge Lovric lifted the stay as to Prudential's request for interpleader relief. Id. At that time, the parties notified Judge Lovric that they had “reached a global settlement” and were preparing “settlement papers” for final review and approval. Id.; Dkt. No. 72.
On June 27, 2022, the Court-appointed guardian ad litem for defendant Z.R. filed a letter requesting to be relieved as counsel effective June 30. Dkt. No. 75. As the letter explained, minor defendant Z.R. would soon attain the age of majority and “be able to speak for himself with respect to the proposed settlement.” Id.
On June 29, 2022, this Court denied without prejudice the request to be relieved as counsel, dismissed as a defendant the Estate of Antonio M. Curtis, granted Prudential's motion for interpleader relief, and directed the remaining parties to file a copy of their executed settlement agreement within thirty days of the date of this Order. Dkt. No. 76; see also Dkt. No. 79.
On July 29, 2022, the parties jointly moved for approval of a stipulation that would settle their dispute over the appropriate distribution of the interpleader funds (the “Policy Proceeds”). Dkt. No. 83.
Upon review of the filings and supporting documentation, it is ORDERED that
1. The joint motion for approval of the stipulation and settlement for distribution of interpleader funds involving a minor is GRANTED;
2. The Policy Proceeds shall be paid in the sums set forth as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial