The Richardson Gas & Oil Company v. The City of Altoona

Decision Date06 February 1909
Docket Number15,814
Citation79 Kan. 466,100 P. 50
CourtKansas Supreme Court
PartiesTHE RICHARDSON GAS & OIL COMPANY v. THE CITY OF ALTOONA

Decided January, 1909.

Error from Wilson district court; LEANDER STILLWELL, judge.

Judgment affirmed.

SYLLABUS

SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.

MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS -- Franchise -- Monopoly. Where a franchise is granted by a city to a gas company authorizing it to furnish to the city and its inhabitants natural gas for light, heat and power, in consideration of which the company agrees to pay to the city annually the sum of $ 300, a further provision that such payments are to continue only so long as the gas company enjoys its franchise without competition is not contrary to public policy as tending to destroy competition and create a monopoly.

P. C Young, for plaintiff in error.

E. D. Mikesell, for defendant in error.

OPINION

PORTER, J.:

In September, 1903, Altoona, a city of the third class, passed an ordinance granting a franchise to the Hemme Gas Company to furnish natural gas to the city and its inhabitants. Under the franchise the city had the option to purchase the gas plant at a fair valuation in case the company during the life of the contract desired to sell the same.

The company accepted the franchise, erected a plant and supplied the city and its inhabitants with gas for several months, when it sold its interests to B. E. Ladow. A few months thereafter the Richardson Gas & Oil Company purchased the plant from Ladow and procured the passage of an ordinance granting it a franchise, by the terms of which the company was to pay to the city twenty per cent. of its "gross proceeds," and the city was given the option to purchase the plant on terms similar to those in the former franchise. The sale of the gas plant to Ladow and the sale from Ladow to the Richardson Gas & Oil Company were both made without notice to, or the consent of, the city.

In October, 1904, the Richardson Gas & Oil Company came before the city council with an offer to pay the city the sum of $ 300 annually, provided the city would enact an ordinance ratifying the two sales of the gas plant, waiving the right of the city to purchase under either of the former franchises and releasing the company from its obligation to pay to the city twenty per cent. of its "gross proceeds." The city accepted the offer and enacted the ordinance. Immediately thereafter a written contract was entered into between the city and the company providing for the payment to the city of $ 300 per annum, as follows: $ 100 January 1, 1905; $ 100 April 1, 1905; $ 50 July 1, 1905; $ 50 October 1, 1905; and like payments on the same days in each year thereafter during the life of the contract. The consideration for the contract is stated therein to be the passage of the ordinance with the provisions as above set forth. The contract also contained the following conditions:

"The above-named payments are to continue as long as the second party enjoys without competition the supplying the inhabitants, manufacturers, corporations and industries in the city of Altoona, and additions, with natural gas for fuel and light. Whenever from any source there shall be competition against second party, thus curtailing its justified income, then these payments to discontinue and stop and not to be...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Weiner v. Wilshire Oil Co. of Tex.
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • March 7, 1964
    ...done, is to read life rather than death into a written instrument executed by competent parties. Richardson Gas & Oil Co. v. [City of] Altoona, 79 Kan. 466, 469, 100 P. 50, 21 L.R.A. [N.S.] 214. To accomplish this end the court should take into consideration all of the circumstances and con......
  • Hays v. Underwood
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • March 5, 1966
    ...courts will so construe an instrument as to carry the intention of the parties into effect where possible. (Richardson Gas & Oil Co. v. City of Altoona, 79 Kan. 466, 100 P. 50, 21 AL.R.A.,N.S., 214.) The law will favor upholding a contract against a claim of uncertainty where one of the par......
  • Lewis v. Nashville Gas & Heating Co.
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • February 7, 1931
    ... ... L. T. Lewis and others against the Nashville Gas & Heating ... Company and the City of Nashville, wherein the gas company ... filed a ... and other like utilities. The principle governing ... Richardson Gas & Oil Co. v. City of Altoona, 79 Kan ... 466, 100 P. 50. 21 L. R. A ... ...
  • Fred Mosher Grain v. Kansas Co-op. Wheat Marketing Ass'n
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • November 5, 1932
    ... ... operating under the name of the Kanorado Equity Elevator ... Company. The petition contained the usual allegations for the ... recovery of ... written instrument executed by competent parties ... Richardson Gas & Oil Co. v. Altoona, 79 Kan. 466, ... 469, 100 P. 50, 21 L.R.A. (N ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT