The State Ex Rel. Edwards Land Co. v. Del. County Bd. of Elections.

Decision Date30 August 2011
Docket NumberNo. 2011–1266.,2011–1266.
Citation954 N.E.2d 1193,2011 -Ohio- 4397,129 Ohio St.3d 580
PartiesThe STATE ex rel. EDWARDS LAND CO., LTD., et al.v.DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

129 Ohio St.3d 580
954 N.E.2d 1193
2011 -Ohio- 4397

The STATE ex rel. EDWARDS LAND CO., LTD., et al.
v.
DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS.

No. 2011–1266.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Submitted Aug. 23, 2011.Decided Aug. 30, 2011.


[954 N.E.2d 1194]

McTigue & McGinnis, L.L.C., Donald J. McTigue, Mark A. McGinnis, Columbus, and J. Corey Colombo; and Crabbe, Brown & James, L.L.P., Larry H. James, Andy Douglas, and Laura M. Comek, Columbus, for relators.Carol Hamilton O'Brien, Delaware County Prosecuting Attorney, and Christopher D. Betts, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.Robert G. Cohen, pro se, urging denial of the writ as amicus curiae.PFEIFER, J.

[Ohio St.3d 580] {¶ 1} This is an original action for a writ of prohibition to prevent respondent, the Delaware County Board of Elections, from certifying a referendum petition and submitting a Liberty Township zoning amendment to the township electorate at the November 8, 2011 general election. Because relators, who applied for the zoning amendment and protested the referendum petition, have established their entitlement to the requested extraordinary relief, we grant the writ.

Statutory Backdrop

{¶ 2} This case arises out of the amendment of a township zoning resolution and the subsequent attempt by certain township citizens to force a referendum vote on the amendment. R.C. 519.12 sets out the process for amending township zoning resolutions and for overturning those amendments. Pursuant to R.C. 519.12(A)(1), an owner of property within the area proposed for a zoning change may initiate an amendment to a township zoning resolution by filing an application with the township zoning commission. R.C. 519.12(A)(2) requires a public hearing before the zoning commission on the proposed amendment. Under R.C. 519.12(E), the zoning commission must solicit a recommendation on the amendment from county or regional planning authorities. That recommendation is

[954 N.E.2d 1195]

considered at the zoning commission's public hearing. After the public hearing, the zoning commission recommends the approval or denial of the proposed amendment, or the approval of some modification of it, and submits that recommendation, the recommendation of the county or regional planning commission, and the text and map pertaining to the proposed amendment to the board of township trustees. R.C. 519.12(E).

{¶ 3} The board of township trustees, in turn, must hold a public hearing on the proposed amendment. R.C. 519.12(E). Pursuant to R.C. 519.12(H), within [Ohio St.3d 581] 20 days of its hearing, the board of trustees must “either adopt or deny the recommendations of the township zoning commission or adopt some modification of them.” If the board denies or modifies the commission's recommendations, a majority vote of the board is required. If the board adopts the proposed zoning amendment, with or without modification, the zoning amendment automatically becomes effective 30 days after the board of trustees' action, unless a referendum petition is filed within those 30 days. R.C. 519.12(H).

{¶ 4} The focus of this case is on R.C. 519.12(H), and specifically on whether the petitioners filed their referendum petition within 30 days of the board of trustees' adoption of the zoning amendment at issue. On what date the board of trustees adopted the zoning amendment is the bone of contention.

Factual and Procedural Background

{¶ 5} In January 2009, relator Valerie Knowlton submitted a zoning-amendment application to Liberty Township—Rezoning Proposal LTZ 09–01—that would amend the township zoning resolution to rezone 216.3 acres on three parcels of township land from Farm Residence District (FR–1) to Planned Residence District (PR). Knowlton owned the property at that time. Relator Edwards Land Company, Ltd. (“Edwards Land”) is a limited-liability company that will be the developer of the property that is subject to rezoning, and relator Charles P. Driscoll Jr. is the company's president.

{¶ 6} In November 2010, Knowlton transferred the property to relator MRLD Farm, Ltd. (“MRLD”), a limited-liability company of which she is a member, and in January 2011, Knowlton amended her rezoning application to reflect that MRLD was the owner of the property. On January 26, 2011, the Liberty Township Zoning Commission voted to recommend approval of the rezoning proposal.

{¶ 7} The proposed amendment then moved to the Liberty Township Board of Trustees for review. Pursuant to R.C. 519.12(H), it then became the board of trustees' duty to “either adopt or deny the recommendations of the township zoning commission or adopt some modification of them.” Beginning on March 15, 2011, and continuing on April 4, 2011, the board of trustees conducted its final public hearing on Rezoning Proposal LTZ 09–01. At the conclusion of the April 4, 2011 hearing, the board of trustees verbally amended the rezoning proposal as follows: (1) “Pillion Way be stubbed and not be connected and, if for any reason it is required to be connected by another authority at a later date, that the connection be restricted to emergency vehicle access only with gates or like devices which will be subject to approval by this Board of Trustees and our Liberty Township Fire Department” and (2) “Red Emerald Way be restricted to emergency vehicle access only, and that it be gated or has such other device as to only allow emergency vehicle access, with such device being subject to approval [Ohio St.3d 582] by the Board of Trustees and the Liberty Township Fire Department.” The board of trustees then unanimously approved the application for rezoning as amended, rezoning

[954 N.E.2d 1196]

216.3 acres on three parcels of township land from Farm Residence District to Planned Residence District.

{¶ 8} At the board of trustees' April 18, 2011 meeting, the board noted that minutes for its March 15 and April 4 meetings would be approved at the board's May 4, 2011 meeting. At the board of trustees' May 4 meeting, the board approved its minutes for the April 4, 2011 meeting; those minutes included the board's approval of the application as amended by the board. May 4 was thus the first date upon which there was an approved, written recordation of the board's April 4 modification and approval of the zoning amendment.

{¶ 9} On June 3, 2011, a group of petitioners filed a referendum petition seeking to submit the board's action approving the rezoning of the property to the electors of Liberty Township. Their filing date fell 60 days after the board of township trustees' April 4 voice-vote adoption of the amended version of MRLD's Rezoning Proposal LTZ 09–01 and 30 days after the board's May 4 approval of the minutes for the April 4 hearing. The petitioners specified that they sought a referendum “on the proposal to amend the Zoning Map of the unincorporated area of Liberty Township, Delaware County, Ohio,” that was “[a]dopted on the 4th day of May, 2011 by the Liberty Township Board of Trustees, Rezoning Proposal LTZ–09–01 [and that] would permit the rezoning of 216+ acres at the intersection of Home Road and Olentangy River Road from Farm Residence District (FR–1) to Planned Residence District (PR).”

{¶ 10} With their petition, the petitioners submitted a black-and-white copy of the official zoning map for all of Liberty Township. The map was not highlighted or otherwise marked to delineate the 216.3–acre property subject to the zoning amendment being challenged.

{¶ 11} On June 23, 2011, relators, Edwards Land, Driscoll, MRLD, and Knowlton, submitted a protest to the Delaware County Board of Elections against the referendum petition. In their protest, relators specified eight separate grounds, including the two grounds argued here—that the referendum petition was not timely filed and that the petitioners did not submit an appropriate map of the area affected by the zoning proposal. On June 28, the board of elections certified the referendum petition and placed the rezoning issue on the November 8, 2011 general-election ballot.

{¶ 12} On July 18, 2011, the board of elections held a hearing on relators' protest. Relators and the petitioners were represented by counsel at the hearing, and sworn testimony was submitted. Kathy Melvin, the clerk of the Liberty Township Board of Trustees, testified that the board of trustees addresses zoning amendments by motion at a public hearing rather than by written [Ohio St.3d 583] resolution because the board considers zoning amendments to require only an “administrative review.” The board of elections voted two-to-one to deny the relators' protest and to affirm its prior certification of the referendum to the November 8 election ballot. The board also issued a document entitled “Findings of Fact and Conclusion and Decision” in which it gave reasons for rejecting each of relators' protest grounds.

{¶ 13} Eight days later, on July 26, 2011, relators filed this action for a writ of prohibition to prevent the board of elections from certifying to the November 8 election ballot a referendum on Liberty Township Rezoning Proposal LTZ 09–01 and a writ of mandamus to compel the board of elections to sustain relators' protest against the referendum petition. Relators also filed a motion to expedite. The

[954 N.E.2d 1197]

board of elections filed an answer and a response to the motion to expedite.

{¶ 14} On August 11, this court granted an expedited alternative writ on relators' prohibition claim and issued an accelerated schedule for the submission of briefs and evidence. 129 Ohio St.3d 1433, 2011-Ohio-3948, 951 N.E.2d 440. We also dismissed relators' mandamus claim. Id.; see, e.g., State ex rel. Phillips v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Elections (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 535, 537, 757 N.E.2d 319, quoting State ex rel. Grendell v. Davidson (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 629, 634, 716 N.E.2d 704 (“ ‘In general, if the allegations of a complaint for a writ of mandamus indicate that the real objects sought are a declaratory judgment and a prohibitory injunction,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State ex rel. Meigs Cnty. Home Rule Comm. v. Cnty. of Meigs Bd. of Comm'rs
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 9 Septiembre 2015
    ...substantial compliance is acceptable only when an election provision expressly states it is.’ ” State ex rel. Edwards Land Co., Ltd. v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Elections, 129 Ohio St.3d 580, 2011-Ohio-4397, 954 N.E.2d 1193, ¶ 41, quoting State ex rel. Ditmars v. McSweeney, 94 Ohio St.3d 472, 4......
  • State ex rel. Orange Twp. Bd. of Trs. v. Del. Cnty. Bd. of Elections, 2012–2077.
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 11 Enero 2013
    ...Davis v. Beaver Twp. Bd. of Trustees, 133 Ohio St.3d 170, 2012-Ohio-4177, 977 N.E.2d 578, ¶ 12;State ex rel. Edwards Land Co., Ltd. v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Elections, 129 Ohio St.3d 580, 2011-Ohio-4397, 954 N.E.2d 1193, ¶ 41. This is necessary to maintain the certainty and accountability es......
  • State ex rel. Davis v. Beaver Twp. Bd. of Trs.
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 14 Septiembre 2012
    ...substantial compliance is acceptable only when an election provision expressly states it is.’ ” State ex rel. Edwards Land Co., Ltd. v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Elections, 129 Ohio St.3d 580, 2011-Ohio-4397, 954 N.E.2d 1193, ¶ 41, quoting State ex rel. Ditmars v. McSweeney, 94 Ohio St.3d 472, 4......
  • Convey It, Inc. v. Chatfield
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • 26 Junio 2012
    ...changes are "manifestly a legislative act." Response, Doc. No. 34, PageID 967, quoting State, ex rel Edwards Land Co., v. Delaware County Bd. Of Elections, 129 Ohio St. 3d 580, 591 (2011). But the Resolution in no way purports to be or effect a zoning change and the Defendant Board of Healt......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT