The Toledo v. Grush

Decision Date31 January 1873
CitationThe Toledo v. Grush, 67 Ill. 262, 1873 WL 8190, 16 Am.Rep. 618 (Ill. 1873)
PartiesTHE TOLEDO, WABASH AND WESTERN RAILWAY CO.v.ANDREW J. GRUSH.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Macon county; the Hon. A. J. GALLAGHER, Judge, presiding.

This was an action on the case, by Andrew J. Grush, against the Toledo, Wabash and Western Railway Company, to recover damages for a personal injury received by the former in stepping through a hole in the platform of defendant's station. A trial was had, resulting in a verdict and judgment of $1000 for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed.

Messrs. NELSON & ROBY, for the appellant.

Messrs. EDEN & ODOR, for the appellee.

Mr. JUSTICE MCALLISTER delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action on the case, brought by appellee in the Macon circuit court, against appellant, to recover for an injury received by the former, in stepping through a hole in the platform of appellant's railroad station. Appellee recovered in the court below, and the only question made upon this appeal is, as to the sufficiency of the evidence. This case is not like that of Gillis v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 59 Penn. St. R. 129, cited by appellant's counsel. That was a case where the plaintiff went upon the platform from mere curiosity and was injured by its fall. It was held, that not being upon the platform lawfully, as a passenger, or for the transaction of business, he could not recover.

In the case under consideration, the plaintiff lawfully entered upon the platform, by the direction of his employer, to see that certain freight belonging to the latter, and which had arrived at the station by appellant's road, was properly taken care of, and while upon the platform, between five and six o'clock p. m., for that purpose, and looking for the agent, he accidentally stepped through a hole in the platform, causing a severe internal injury, most satisfactorily established by the evidence.

He being lawfully there,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
27 cases
  • Davis v. South Side Elevated R.R. Co.
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 21 April 1920
    ...141 Mass. 33,6 N. E. 226. This court has had occasion several times to rule on kindred questions. In Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. Grush, 67 Ill. 262, 264,16 Am. Rep. 618, the court had under consideration a case where a passenger had been injured by a defect in the floor in the p......
  • Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company v. Slaughter
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • 13 November 1906
    ... ... 644; ... Smith v. London, etc., Docks Co. [1868], L ... R. 3 C. P. 326; Carleton v. Franconia Iron, ... etc., Co. [1868], 99 Mass. 216; Toledo, etc., R ... Co. v. Grush [1873], 67 Ill. 262, 16 Am. Rep ... 618; Doss v. Missouri, etc., R. Co. [1875], ... 59 Mo. 27, 21 Am. Rep. 371; ... ...
  • St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company v. Barnett
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 23 April 1898
    ...etc. Hutch. Car. § 516; Penn. R. Co. v. Henderson, 51 Pa. 315; Liscomb v. Ry. & Trans. Co., 6 Lans. 75; Toledo, etc. R. Co. 1. Grush, 67 Ill. 262; McDonald v. C. & Ft. S. Co. Cavenesse, supra; Ray, Neg. Imp. Duties, 91 Wallace v. Wilmington & N. R. Co., 18 A. 818; 2 Wood, Railways, pp. 1340......
  • Glenn v. Lake Erie & W.R. Co.
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 17 March 1905
    ...v. Long Island R. Co., 9 Hun, 618); also a servant of the owner of freight who goes to a station to take it away (Toledo W. & W. R. Co. v. Grush, 67 Ill. 262, 16 Am. Rep. 618); also to one removing a box of freight from the depot to his wagon (Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Wolfe, 80 Ky. 82). Ra......
  • Get Started for Free