The Union Nat'l Bank v. the Oceana County Bank.

CourtIllinois Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtSCOTT
CitationThe Union Nat'l Bank v. the Oceana County Bank., 80 Ill. 212, 1875 WL 8736, 22 Am.Rep. 185 (Ill. 1875)
Decision Date30 September 1875
PartiesTHE UNION NATIONAL BANKv.THE OCEANA COUNTY BANK.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. LAMBERT TREE, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. FULLER & SMITH, for the appellant.

Messrs. J. C. & J. J. KNICKERBOCKER, for the appellee.

Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE SCOTT delivered the opinion of the Court:

This action is upon a check drawn by James H. Ledlie, on the Union National Bank of Chicago, in favor of Underhill and Gray, and by them indorsed and delivered to the Oceana County Bank, located at Pentwater, in Michigan. The declaration contains a special count upon the check, and also the common money counts. On the trial, plaintiff recovered a judgment for the amount of the check, with interest, and defendant brings the cause to this court on appeal.

The evidence shows there was no unreasonable delay in presenting the check to defendant for payment, and, notwithstanding it is shown the bank had funds in its possession on deposit subject to check, at the time, belonging to the drawer, in excess of the amount of the check, payment was refused, for the reason the drawer had previously ordered the bank not to pay it.

The facts proven in this case bring it clearly within the rule declared in Munn et al. v. Burch et al. 25 Ill. 35. The doctrine of that case has been so frequently affirmed in other cases in this court, it is not necessary now to discuss it as a new question. The principle of all the cases in this court on this subject is, that, when a depositor draws his check on his banker, who has funds to an equal or greater sum than his check, it operates to transfer the sum named to the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
34 cases
  • Clendening v. The Red River Valley Nat. Bank of Fargo
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • May 5, 1903
    ... ...           Appeal ... from District Court, Cass County; Charles A. Pollock, J ...          Action ... by A. E ... ...
  • Hogue v. Edwards
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 31, 1881
    ...that a transfer of the check carries with it the title to the amount named in the check to each successive holder.” Union National Bank v. Oceana National Bank, 80 Ill. 212. The check in this case is not of that character. It was drawn payable in Chicago exchange, and if it had been deliver......
  • Welge v. Batty
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 31, 1882
    ...After a check has passed into the hands of a bona fide holder, the drawer can not countermand the order for payment: Union Nat. Bank v. Oceana Co. Bank, 80 Ill. 212; Munn v. Burch, 25 Ill. 35; Brown v. Leckie, 43 Ill. 497; Fourth Nat. Bank v. City Nat. Bank, 68 Ill. 398; Bickford v. First N......
  • Cincinnati, H. & D. R. Co. v. Metropolitan Nat. Bank
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • January 21, 1896
    ... ... Burch, 25 Ill. 35; Insurance Co ... v. Standford, 28 Ill. 168; Union Nat. Bank v. Oceana Co ... Bank, 80 Ill. 212 (but see opinion in Essex ... 82. The action was upon a bond given by ... Emmitt to the county commissioners in the sale of a bridge by ... the Scioto Bridge Company, ... ...
  • Get Started for Free