The United States, Plaintiffs v. Thomas Staats, Junior
Decision Date | 01 January 1850 |
Citation | 12 L.Ed. 979,49 U.S. 41,8 How. 41 |
Parties | THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS, v. THOMAS STAATS, JUNIOR |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial51 cases
-
Moskal v. United States, 89-964
...document. United States v. Davis, 231 U.S. 183, 187-188, 34 S.Ct. 112, 112-113, 58 L.Ed. 177 (1913) (dictum); United States v. Staats, 8 How. 41, 46, 12 L.Ed. 979 (1850) (dictum); United States ex rel. Starr v. Mulligan, 59 F.2d 200 (CA 2 1932); United States v. Smith, 262 F. 191 (Ind.1920)......
-
People v. Barker
...adhered to with great strictness; and properly so, where this intent is a material element of the crime. " (United States v. Staats (1850), 49 U.S. (8 How.) 41, 44, 12 L.Ed. 979, 981.) See United States v. Heller (6th Cir. 1978), 579 F.2d 990, 998-99; United States v. Morrison (9th Cir. 197......
-
United States v. Schneiderman
...9 Cir., 1946, 152 F.2d 933, 935, certiorari denied, 1946, 328 U.S. 862, 66 S.Ct. 1362, 90 L.Ed. 1632; cf. United States v. Staats, 1850, 8 How. 41, 49 U.S. 41, 44, 12 L.Ed. 979. To hold then that "wilfully," as employed in the Smith Act and in the indictments at bar, denotes an "intent * * ......
-
United States v. Jimicum
...attention that Prussian was not decided until 1931 — some 108 years after enactment of the predecessor to § 495 in 1823. See United States v. Staats, 49 (8 How. 41) U.S. 41, 44, 12 L.Ed. 979 (1850). Nor can it be ignored that prior to Prussian, the circuits were wandering hither and yon on ......
Request a trial to view additional results