The United States v. Potts and Others
Decision Date | 01 February 1809 |
Parties | THE UNITED STATES v. POTTS AND OTHERS |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial4 cases
-
Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. v. U.S.
...question does not fall within the definition of "manufactures" as laid down by this court in numerous cases. Thus, in U.S. v. Potts, 5 Cranch, 284, 9 U.S. 284, 3 L.Ed. 102, round copper bottoms turned up at the edge, not imported for use in the form in which they were imported, but designed......
-
In re I. Rheinstrom & Sons Co.
... 207 F. 119 In re I. RHEINSTROM & SONS CO. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky. June 16, 1913 ... [207 F. 120] ... cherries, and with which others were flavored was what is ... termed 'Marasque water,' made from cherries ... States v. Potts, 5 Cranch, 284, 3 L.Ed. 102, in which it ... was held that round copper ... ...
-
Union Wire Rope Corporation v. Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co.
...30 L. Ed. 1012; Lawrence v. Allen, 7 How. 785, 12 L. Ed. 914; United States v. Hathaway, 4 Wall. 404, 18 L. Ed. 395; United States v. Potts, 5 Cranch, 284, 3 L. Ed. 102; In re Tecopa Mining & Smelting Co. (D. C.) 110 F. 120; Foppes v. Magone (C. C.) 40 F. 570. Broadly, to manufacture means ......
-
Walling v. Armbruster
...in that shape as a shoe, and had been put into a new form capable of use and designed to be used in such new form. In United States v. Potts, 5 Cranch, 284 3 L. Ed. 102, round copper plates turned up and raised at the edges from four to five inches by the application of labor, to fit them f......